The Detroit Tigers find themselves in a curious position. As recently as two years ago, the team seemed to be prepared to hold out for future success. They appeared committed to an in-house building plan. A plan that would require time and patience. However, it now appears the Tigers are on a revised Plan B.
Remember when Alan Trammell was hired as manager? The prevailing thought at the time was "Sure, Alan's a rookie manager. He will make mistakes, but he will grow with the team and both should be ready to win at the same time." Of course, most of us figured the emphasis on winning would be several years off, as the Tigers were going to go with their homegrown talent. Trammell would have plenty of time to figure out the fine points of managing.
However, the Tigers direction changed quickly after the 2003 season. After compiling the worst record in American League history, the Tigers were desperate. Not only were the Tigers in dire need of some positive buzz, to generate interest in a morbid franchise, but the contracts with luxury suite ticket holders expired. The Tigers needed some good public relations to encourage those suite holders to renew. They also needed a reason for the rest of the Motor City to show up at all.
To address this matter, the Tigers went the free agency route. Detroit signed Al Levine, Fernando Vina, Jason Johnson, Rondell White and Ivan Rodriguez last winter. The pursuit of Rodriguez alone generated more interest in the Tigers than they had over the last decade. Once signed, the mere presence of the future Hall of Fame catcher sold tickets and created headlines.
It was just what the doctor ordered. Well, sort of. Pudge and company powered the Tigers to an incredible April. Detroit spent much of the initial month of the season in first place. While that level of play was unsustainable, the Tigers went on to improve by twenty-nine games. What's the downside of that? Expectations.
Now, Tiger fans expect more. There is talk of contending for the Central Division title in 2005. Why not? They just jumped up twenty-nine games. Fans argue that if the Tigers shore up a horrible bullpen, get an outfielder and maybe another starter, who knows?
Management has probably altered their expectations as well. The new look and vastly improved on-field product created a large increase in ticket sales. Hosting the All-Star Game in 2005, the Tigers could once again post a significant gain in attendance (and revenue) with hopes of even a better team next year.
In theory, the Tigers would be looking to their farm system to fill some of these key holes. However, 2004 revealed that very, very few Tiger farmhands look anywhere near ready to contribute in 2005. The kiddie corps most of us envisioned Trammell leading appears years away. Thus, to improve the Tigers must either make trades of visit the free agent market once again.
All indications lead towards opening up Mike Ilitch's checkbook for help this winter. When the Tigers pulled the offer from their number one draft pick, Justin Verlander, they not only dealt a blow to the future, but implied the money not used on the prospect would be spent on a free agent. That doesn't sound like Dombrowski's original plan to me. Suddenly, the Tigers are acting as if the future is now.
Now, I don't believe that this Plan B completely foregoes Dombrowski's emphasis on building from within. No organization with limited resources can afford that and Dombrowski has shown an ability and desire to build farm systems. This revised direction just places more attention on the immediate future of the big league club as help from the minors appears to be quite a ways off.
However, I wonder about the Tigers in the short-term. Can Trammell survive this change in direction? If the Tigers go out and acquire more veterans this winter, there will be even more pressure and scrutiny on Trammell. Depending on what new faces show up in Lakeland in March, Trammell might be expected to duplicate 2004's increase in wins. The next twenty game improvement will be far more difficult.
I also wonder what this team looks like in two to three years? Guys like Bobby Higginson, White, Vina, Levine, Johnson and others will be gone. Rodriguez will be nearing the end of his deal. Will some of the Tigers' young pitchers (Jeremy Bonderman, Wilfredo Ledezma, Nate Robertson, Mike Maroth) be able to carry the club by then? Will the next wave of prospects be ready by 2007? Will any of them turnout to be the impact players the organization appears to lack currently? Will the Tigers be going through a complete transition to youth in '07 or '08 that many of us thought would be going on right now? Or will Ilitch continue to spend in free agency to sustain a level of respectability?
Even with a revised plan in place, the long term future of the ballclub is as cloudy as ever. Dombrowski has played the cards dealt him beautifully to this point, but reviving this franchise will still depend greatly on the ability to develop prospects from within. That part of the plan hasn't changed. It also doesn't look significantly better than it did two years ago.
Update: Verlander suprisingly signed with the Tigers yesterday. Seems his agent may have been the primary roadblock to a deal. Here is the Detroit Free Press account. While it's great to add a power arm to the organization, I doubt we will see Verlander making much of a contribution before mid-2006. That may not be soon enough to help Trammell'c cause.
Friday, October 22, 2004
S.I. All-Americans
Sports Illustrated released it's picks for mid-season All-Americans. Three Michigan and one Michigan State player made the first team. Click here to see S.I.'s choices.
Un-Retiring Numbers
Paul Lukas, of Uni Watch at ESPN.com, offers this:
Update: Uni Watch's recent examination of retired numbers gained a bit of extra resonance this week when Jerry Rice was traded to the Seahawks. Rice has worn uni number 80 for his entire career, first with the 49ers and then with the Raiders. But the Seahawks retired that number in 1995, in honor of Steve Largent. Given Rice's recent temper tantrums regarding playing time and the loss of his consecutive-game reception streak, how would he react to having to wear an unfamiliar number?
Not to worry. Calls were made, permission from Largent was requested and received, and Rice will be wearing number 80 after all.
First, Rice better not be crying about uniform numbers at this point in his career. As Lukas points out, playing time should be a bigger concern. (Note to Jerry: In case you are still wondering why the Raiders didn't toss you a pass, look at what they got in return for you. A seventh round draft pick. The Seahawks could probably get an eighth rounder for Largent right now.)
Second, and more importantly, it seems like uniform numbers are un-retiring about as often as boxers do. I, for one, am growing a bit weary of the trend. Either take the number out of action forever or don't retire numbers. What's the point of giving Steve Largent the honor of retiring his number so a washed up Jerry Rice can wear it for half a season?
If a player is so special or important to a franchise that the team retires his number, let's assume that no matter who arrives after, the number should stay retired.
Update: Uni Watch's recent examination of retired numbers gained a bit of extra resonance this week when Jerry Rice was traded to the Seahawks. Rice has worn uni number 80 for his entire career, first with the 49ers and then with the Raiders. But the Seahawks retired that number in 1995, in honor of Steve Largent. Given Rice's recent temper tantrums regarding playing time and the loss of his consecutive-game reception streak, how would he react to having to wear an unfamiliar number?
Not to worry. Calls were made, permission from Largent was requested and received, and Rice will be wearing number 80 after all.
First, Rice better not be crying about uniform numbers at this point in his career. As Lukas points out, playing time should be a bigger concern. (Note to Jerry: In case you are still wondering why the Raiders didn't toss you a pass, look at what they got in return for you. A seventh round draft pick. The Seahawks could probably get an eighth rounder for Largent right now.)
Second, and more importantly, it seems like uniform numbers are un-retiring about as often as boxers do. I, for one, am growing a bit weary of the trend. Either take the number out of action forever or don't retire numbers. What's the point of giving Steve Largent the honor of retiring his number so a washed up Jerry Rice can wear it for half a season?
If a player is so special or important to a franchise that the team retires his number, let's assume that no matter who arrives after, the number should stay retired.
Thursday, October 21, 2004
Lions Diary
Jason Whitlock, over at ESPN.com, lists his top fifteen NFL quarterbacks. Get a look at number twelve.
Sox In Series
I should say something about one of the greatest playoff series ever played. I loved Boston Red Sox victory over the New York Yankees. However, I should put the disclaimer in right now. I am a member of Red Sox Nation. This adopted cousin of the Commonwealth's team joined the legions in 1975. That, friends, is a long time ago. I may relay the details of my entry into The Nation during the World Series, but suffice to say, I am not unbiased. (I guess that makes me equal with 99% of the journalists who claim they are.)
As such, I was happy to see the Sox get the breaks, bounces and calls for a change. I was also happy to see the Sox play some tough minded baseball at times. Especially, late in games. Those late inning miracles are usually the games the Sox lose, Carlton Fisk's shot notwithstanding.
Overall, I don't think you can expect much more tension or drama from a playoff series, or sport in general, than the Red Sox and Yankees provided over the last week. It was great theatre and another boost for the game's image. Obviously, the thing that clinched it for me was the Boston triumph.
Having said that, let me also state that I am not at all satisfied. Not even close. Sure, many in The Nation probably are just as happy to see the Sox make playoff history against the hated New York Yankees as they would be to win the next round. I, however, will not be pacified quite so easily.
The nightmare that is the Red Sox post-season history, post 1918, won't end until they win the World Series. No amount of playoff destruction or general humiliation of King George's pinstripers is going to make up for 1975 or 1986 in my book.
Yeah, dropping the over-confident Yanks in their house, in front of their fans, does balance out some of the Bucky Dent/Aaron Boone crap, but it doesn't give the Sox the most elusive prize. Only a World Championship can dull the pain of four straight World Series losses (1946, 1967, 1975, 1986) each in seven painful games. Only four more wins can help offset the champion-less streak dating back to World War I.
Winning this remarkable series is great. It's sweet revenge. It's also four wins shy of what generations of Red Sox fans have waited for. At least, this year's Sox get a chance to make those dreams come true.
As such, I was happy to see the Sox get the breaks, bounces and calls for a change. I was also happy to see the Sox play some tough minded baseball at times. Especially, late in games. Those late inning miracles are usually the games the Sox lose, Carlton Fisk's shot notwithstanding.
Overall, I don't think you can expect much more tension or drama from a playoff series, or sport in general, than the Red Sox and Yankees provided over the last week. It was great theatre and another boost for the game's image. Obviously, the thing that clinched it for me was the Boston triumph.
Having said that, let me also state that I am not at all satisfied. Not even close. Sure, many in The Nation probably are just as happy to see the Sox make playoff history against the hated New York Yankees as they would be to win the next round. I, however, will not be pacified quite so easily.
The nightmare that is the Red Sox post-season history, post 1918, won't end until they win the World Series. No amount of playoff destruction or general humiliation of King George's pinstripers is going to make up for 1975 or 1986 in my book.
Yeah, dropping the over-confident Yanks in their house, in front of their fans, does balance out some of the Bucky Dent/Aaron Boone crap, but it doesn't give the Sox the most elusive prize. Only a World Championship can dull the pain of four straight World Series losses (1946, 1967, 1975, 1986) each in seven painful games. Only four more wins can help offset the champion-less streak dating back to World War I.
Winning this remarkable series is great. It's sweet revenge. It's also four wins shy of what generations of Red Sox fans have waited for. At least, this year's Sox get a chance to make those dreams come true.
The Bad News
In the wake of the Red Sox dramatic victory in the American League Championship Series, a portion of New England went criminal. Seems the locals in several areas got into fights, both with each other and the police, started things on fire and overturned some cars. One college student actually lost her life. (Related links: here and here.)
Shouldn't they all be getting along after their team won? Why fight with each other or destroy property? I'll just never comprehend this type behavior, alcohol induced or not. For someone to lose their life celebrating the night the Sox returned to the World Series for the first time in eighteen years is shameful.
Shouldn't they all be getting along after their team won? Why fight with each other or destroy property? I'll just never comprehend this type behavior, alcohol induced or not. For someone to lose their life celebrating the night the Sox returned to the World Series for the first time in eighteen years is shameful.
Fielder Falls
Ex-Detroit Tiger star Cecil Fielder is apparently in quite a bit of financial trouble due to a gambling problem. The Detroit News revealed Fielder's problem in a cover story this past Sunday. If nothing else, Fielder's story should give some people insight into why gambling and professional athletes just are not a good mix under almost any circumstance.
If Fielder can toss away forty-seven million and end up running from those he owes money to, what might he have been willing to do if the debt was owed while he was still an active player? It's not a thought I am terribly comfortable with.
If Fielder can toss away forty-seven million and end up running from those he owes money to, what might he have been willing to do if the debt was owed while he was still an active player? It's not a thought I am terribly comfortable with.
Tuesday, October 19, 2004
B.B. Baker's Dozen
Surprise, surprise. The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) rankings are out and most everyone thinks they are wrong. I'm not surprised. It's a poll. Sure, it's a great big poll using data from all the other polls, but it's flawed just like the others. It doesn't much matter, though. It's all just fodder for discussion. Well, until someone gets left out of the title game, anyway.
1. Southern Cal- Headed for Orange Bowl.
2. Oklahoma- #3 in BCS. Second everywhere else.
3. Miami- #2 in BCS. Third everywhere else.
4. Utah- Beat UNC to maintain spot.
5. Auburn- Hard to argue with 7-0.
6. Florida State- Pasted UVA. On the move up.
7. Georgia- I still think this is a good team.
8. Texas- I'm not sure what I think about 'Horns.
9. California- Rodgers stay in Heisman chase.
10. Wisconsin- Badgers are Big Ten top dog.
11. Michigan- Gets Purdue Saturday.
12. Tennessee- Ainge continues to find a way to win.
13. Purdue- 'Boilers face elimination game this week.
1. Southern Cal- Headed for Orange Bowl.
2. Oklahoma- #3 in BCS. Second everywhere else.
3. Miami- #2 in BCS. Third everywhere else.
4. Utah- Beat UNC to maintain spot.
5. Auburn- Hard to argue with 7-0.
6. Florida State- Pasted UVA. On the move up.
7. Georgia- I still think this is a good team.
8. Texas- I'm not sure what I think about 'Horns.
9. California- Rodgers stay in Heisman chase.
10. Wisconsin- Badgers are Big Ten top dog.
11. Michigan- Gets Purdue Saturday.
12. Tennessee- Ainge continues to find a way to win.
13. Purdue- 'Boilers face elimination game this week.
Sunday, October 17, 2004
Still The One
Carlos Beltran remains the best baseball player on Earth. At worst, he's simply the hottest hitter alive. Here's today's proof. Beltran, a free agent, is going to be very, very wealthy. Very, very soon.
Big Ben Believer
I am officially on the Ben Roethlisberger Bandwagon. Watching the Pittsburgh Steelers rookie against Dallas this afternoon, I am convinced. This kid has the potential to be special. His size is the first thing that caught my attention, but what I am most impressed with is Roethlisberger's feel for the game.
Unlike most rookies, forget that, most players, Big Ben seems to have a sense of where his teammates and opponents are at. He doesn't panic. He appears to improvise very well. He can throw on the run. He creates space for himself to throw. He scrambles effectively. It all those little things coaches and scouts blabber on about for days that make Roethlisberger unique for his age.
I now understand why Bill Parcells said the Big Ben is best looking rookie quarterback he has seen play since Dan Marino. Roethlisberger sure looks like the real deal. I, for one, am now a believer.
Unlike most rookies, forget that, most players, Big Ben seems to have a sense of where his teammates and opponents are at. He doesn't panic. He appears to improvise very well. He can throw on the run. He creates space for himself to throw. He scrambles effectively. It all those little things coaches and scouts blabber on about for days that make Roethlisberger unique for his age.
I now understand why Bill Parcells said the Big Ben is best looking rookie quarterback he has seen play since Dan Marino. Roethlisberger sure looks like the real deal. I, for one, am now a believer.
Lions Diary
I told you I had a bad feeling about the Packers game. In typical Lions fashion, Detroit went out and got spanked by Green Bay this afternoon, 38-10. After being a road dog to a hot Atlanta team and winning a week ago, the Lions come home favorites to a Green Bay team headed out to pasture only to see themselves end up slipping on the cow pie today. Typical.
I think it's safe to say a number of players stunk the joint up headed by Joey Harrington. Eventually, Harrington needs to make plays. Big plays. It hasn't happened yet. The Lions' QB was far from alone, though. There is plenty of blame to toss around.
I just knew this sort of thing was going to happen. Too many were way too high on the Lions and everything set-up just too perfectly (Lions coming off a road win, G.B. coming off a horrible home loss). I could dwell on it more, but I may just toss it out and pin my hopes on next Sunday.
I think it's safe to say a number of players stunk the joint up headed by Joey Harrington. Eventually, Harrington needs to make plays. Big plays. It hasn't happened yet. The Lions' QB was far from alone, though. There is plenty of blame to toss around.
I just knew this sort of thing was going to happen. Too many were way too high on the Lions and everything set-up just too perfectly (Lions coming off a road win, G.B. coming off a horrible home loss). I could dwell on it more, but I may just toss it out and pin my hopes on next Sunday.
Friday, October 15, 2004
No Name, No Owner, But We Got Uniforms
Washington, D.C. has baseball back. Now, they need uniforms. I stumbled across this very cool design at ball-wonk.com. I haven't see the rest of the competition, but this design gets high marks.
NHL Lockout Notes
Apparently, Commissioner Bettman showed up in Raleigh to quiet fears the Hurricanes could get contracted. Seems the Commish doesn't understand why people would wonder such things, but then informs all that the 'Canes have lost tens of millions per season in a league that has lost $1.8 billion over the last ten seasons. Hmm? I wonder why contraction is being rumored?
Bettman has told everyone that contraction is not an option. That with the right financial plan (a salary cap) all thirty teams can be successful. I could be wrong, but hasn't he basically contracted the whole league right now?
Bettman assured all that the Raleigh area was a "terrific market". I'm sure it is. For college basketball. You'll note there is no comment in the AP story about how many attended this town hall meeting.
One other NHL note. ESPN.com ran a poll yesterday asking when you would miss the NHL? 156,135 fans voted when I checked last. 60.8% chose never. That's in never. Ever. I'm sure none of the voters were from the Raleigh area, though.
Bettman has told everyone that contraction is not an option. That with the right financial plan (a salary cap) all thirty teams can be successful. I could be wrong, but hasn't he basically contracted the whole league right now?
Bettman assured all that the Raleigh area was a "terrific market". I'm sure it is. For college basketball. You'll note there is no comment in the AP story about how many attended this town hall meeting.
One other NHL note. ESPN.com ran a poll yesterday asking when you would miss the NHL? 156,135 fans voted when I checked last. 60.8% chose never. That's in never. Ever. I'm sure none of the voters were from the Raleigh area, though.
Sponsorship Overload
This is why some have trouble taking auto racing seriously. Casey Mears won the pole for the NASCAR Busch Series SpongeBob SquarePants Movie 300. I did not make that up. It's the name of the race. Really. The NASCAR Busch Series SpongeBob SquarePants Movie 300. I know you still don't believe me. Click here for confirmation.
I wouldn't even want to win the race with that ridiculous a name. I pity the poor guy that does. The stinking name of the race is a paragraph long. By the time a sportswriter gets done typing it, there won't be enough space left to mention who won. Besides, I shudder to think of the trophy featuring good ol' SpongeBob pounding down a Busch beer.
I wouldn't even want to win the race with that ridiculous a name. I pity the poor guy that does. The stinking name of the race is a paragraph long. By the time a sportswriter gets done typing it, there won't be enough space left to mention who won. Besides, I shudder to think of the trophy featuring good ol' SpongeBob pounding down a Busch beer.
Tigers Drop Offer To Top Pick
Justin Verlander and the Detroit Tigers just cannot reach a contract agreement. As such, the Tigers have backed out of negotiations with the number two overall pick. This is a bad public relations move in the short term. In the long term, it delays the Tigers' internal rebuilding process.
A deal could still be worked out, but Verlander will have to change his mind because it looks like the Tigers have made up their's.
A deal could still be worked out, but Verlander will have to change his mind because it looks like the Tigers have made up their's.
One, Two, Three Strikes And A Lockout For You
Let me see if I have this right. The NHL is in the midst of a lockout. The hot rumor in the NBA is that the basketball league will face a similar fate this time next year. While the Major League Baseball Players Association is already preparing for baseball's next work stoppage in 2006.
This leads me to two questions. 1) Who is more stupid: The leagues/players' unions or us fans? 2) When does that NFL labor agreement end?
This leads me to two questions. 1) Who is more stupid: The leagues/players' unions or us fans? 2) When does that NFL labor agreement end?
Seeing Red(birds)
I know the American League Championship Series is getting all the attention, but there is a very entertaining battle going on in the National League C.S. The St. Louis Cardinals and Houston Astros are trading blows, with the Cards just having too many weapons so far. The Astros lineup of Jeff Bagwell, Jeff Kent, Lance Berkman, Craig Biggio and my current choice for best player in the game, Carlos Beltran are loaded, but the Cardinals can top that.
Larry Walker, Scott Rolen, Albert Pujols, Jim Edmonds and Edgar Renteria have been just a few runs better each night. Even with the Astros top pitchers on deck, Roy Oswalt and Roger Clemens, I don't think we are going to see any perfect games through seven innings in this series. These teams can rake.
It certainly looks like the Cards are going to advance, being up 2-0. In spite of what I feel is questionable starting pitching for St. Louis, it's going to be hard for either New York or Boston to stop this impressive Cardinals attack.
Larry Walker, Scott Rolen, Albert Pujols, Jim Edmonds and Edgar Renteria have been just a few runs better each night. Even with the Astros top pitchers on deck, Roy Oswalt and Roger Clemens, I don't think we are going to see any perfect games through seven innings in this series. These teams can rake.
It certainly looks like the Cards are going to advance, being up 2-0. In spite of what I feel is questionable starting pitching for St. Louis, it's going to be hard for either New York or Boston to stop this impressive Cardinals attack.
College Hoops Time
Midnight Madness has returned. For those in my neck of the woods, Big Ten country, here is a story about the conference's potential breakout players courtesy of collegehoopsnet.com.
Of course, there is also the continuing work of Yoni at the college basketball blog. You want hoops? These sites have got more college basketball news than you can handle.
Of course, there is also the continuing work of Yoni at the college basketball blog. You want hoops? These sites have got more college basketball news than you can handle.
Thursday, October 14, 2004
Club vs. Country
The debate has raged over club versus country. International football (that's soccer) fans, coaches and players have wondered which should be more important. The battle has reached the States, as U.S. coach Bruce Arena recently chided Major League Soccer for it's scheduling of games during World Cup qualifying contests.
Here's an interesting column about the subject from a European perspective. Seems the problem will never go away.
Here's an interesting column about the subject from a European perspective. Seems the problem will never go away.
Just A Bit Outside
Drew Sharp, a writer for the Detroit Free Press, wrote this column about Ken Caminiti's death. The tone of the piece, that athletes should learn about the potential dangers of steroid abuse, is right on. The fact baseball, Caminiti's sport, is drilled is slightly off-base.
Sure, baseball has a drug problem. It has a fairly lame testing and enforcement policy, too. However, this is just piling on the "Baseball is a dead sport" bandwagon that began after the last work stoppage.
Did anyone take note of this past Olympics? How many athletes got bounced out of The Games for testing positive for steroids? It was nearly a daily occurrence.
Forget the regular Olympics, some Paralympic athletes that got booted for testing positive for steroids and other illegal substances. Baseball players are the only ones who are having a problem?
When Lyle Alzado died years ago, many suspected his death was steroid related. Steve Corson, the offensive lineman with the Pittsburgh Steelers, suffered with a number of unique medical conditions that many attributed to steroids. Alzado and Corson played in the 70's when a number of players began using a all kinds substances to improve performance. Did any football players learn? Seems a number get caught each season.
Honestly, in a league widely regarded as bigger, faster and stronger than it was when men like Alzado and Corson played, does anyone think that maybe steroids are still an issue in the NFL? No, that can't be, they have testing. Of course, the Olympics have tested for years. That hasn't stopped the use or caught every suspected abuser.
To imply baseball is alone in the depths of performance enhancing substance abusers, or that this is the first death that could be connected to steroid abuse, is wrong.
Update: ESPN is reporting Caminiti died of a drug overdose.
Sure, baseball has a drug problem. It has a fairly lame testing and enforcement policy, too. However, this is just piling on the "Baseball is a dead sport" bandwagon that began after the last work stoppage.
Did anyone take note of this past Olympics? How many athletes got bounced out of The Games for testing positive for steroids? It was nearly a daily occurrence.
Forget the regular Olympics, some Paralympic athletes that got booted for testing positive for steroids and other illegal substances. Baseball players are the only ones who are having a problem?
When Lyle Alzado died years ago, many suspected his death was steroid related. Steve Corson, the offensive lineman with the Pittsburgh Steelers, suffered with a number of unique medical conditions that many attributed to steroids. Alzado and Corson played in the 70's when a number of players began using a all kinds substances to improve performance. Did any football players learn? Seems a number get caught each season.
Honestly, in a league widely regarded as bigger, faster and stronger than it was when men like Alzado and Corson played, does anyone think that maybe steroids are still an issue in the NFL? No, that can't be, they have testing. Of course, the Olympics have tested for years. That hasn't stopped the use or caught every suspected abuser.
To imply baseball is alone in the depths of performance enhancing substance abusers, or that this is the first death that could be connected to steroid abuse, is wrong.
Update: ESPN is reporting Caminiti died of a drug overdose.
Let's Call The Whole Thing Off
I have a new approach for the hockey lockout. Let's hope it lasts forever. Yes, I'm serious. Let's let these two groups of morons, the NHL's owners and players, shut down the league for good. You may rightfully wonder how this helps? Well, perhaps, the best way to get professional hockey back is to eliminate the only two obstacles to that end-the current owners and players union.
The only way to get Gary Bettman and Bob Goodenow out of the equation is to have the National Hockey League go belly up. (Do any two people deserve to be unemployed more than these two?) Yes, that's dramatic. Yes, there is a high cost. There is also a cost in letting these guys continue to lead this dog and pony show. A cost, that in the end, may be the same.
Leaving Bettman and Goodenow at the helm of a sport that is slightly above a cottage industry is darn near suicide, anyway. If Bettman and Goodenow have proved nothing else, they have given us ample evidence that hockey is not headed in the right direction. Work stoppages. Lower quality of play. Terrible public relations. Even worse television ratings.
Need more proof? Recently, Mr. Bettman said in a radio interview, and I paraphrase here, "We are not trying to save the season, we are trying to correct the league's financial structure". That sounds like a solid plan. Toss a season away for a salary cap. That won't be a public relations disaster of unequal comparison.
All Bettman and Goodenow do well now, other than not talk to each other, is hammer one another in the media. They also do a great job of dragging the league's image even further into the mud. Given an entire year to not negotiate a deal, cancel the whole season's schedule and call each other liars should make the barely visible NHL hard to find with radar, a GPS system and a shovel by 2006.
In this political season, here is the question every single hockey fan should ask themselves. Is hockey better off today than four years ago? How about ten years ago? Twenty? If the answer is yes, you probably disagree with me completely and that's fine.
If the answer is no, maybe it's time we considered letting go. Let Bettman and Goodenow destroy the league and we will wait for a new one to take it's place. (Trust me, if the public demands pro hockey, another league will form in the NHL's absence.) I'm willing to let these guys go down with the ship and wait for the next ship to come along. I'm willing to wave bye-bye to the NHL and the-powers-that-be for good.
You may not be willing to go that far yet. I understand. The NHL is cool sans the labor rhetoric. It's has a glorious history. One none of us wants to see disappear. Just keep in mind that Bettman and Goodenow might be willing to follow my example.
The only way to get Gary Bettman and Bob Goodenow out of the equation is to have the National Hockey League go belly up. (Do any two people deserve to be unemployed more than these two?) Yes, that's dramatic. Yes, there is a high cost. There is also a cost in letting these guys continue to lead this dog and pony show. A cost, that in the end, may be the same.
Leaving Bettman and Goodenow at the helm of a sport that is slightly above a cottage industry is darn near suicide, anyway. If Bettman and Goodenow have proved nothing else, they have given us ample evidence that hockey is not headed in the right direction. Work stoppages. Lower quality of play. Terrible public relations. Even worse television ratings.
Need more proof? Recently, Mr. Bettman said in a radio interview, and I paraphrase here, "We are not trying to save the season, we are trying to correct the league's financial structure". That sounds like a solid plan. Toss a season away for a salary cap. That won't be a public relations disaster of unequal comparison.
All Bettman and Goodenow do well now, other than not talk to each other, is hammer one another in the media. They also do a great job of dragging the league's image even further into the mud. Given an entire year to not negotiate a deal, cancel the whole season's schedule and call each other liars should make the barely visible NHL hard to find with radar, a GPS system and a shovel by 2006.
In this political season, here is the question every single hockey fan should ask themselves. Is hockey better off today than four years ago? How about ten years ago? Twenty? If the answer is yes, you probably disagree with me completely and that's fine.
If the answer is no, maybe it's time we considered letting go. Let Bettman and Goodenow destroy the league and we will wait for a new one to take it's place. (Trust me, if the public demands pro hockey, another league will form in the NHL's absence.) I'm willing to let these guys go down with the ship and wait for the next ship to come along. I'm willing to wave bye-bye to the NHL and the-powers-that-be for good.
You may not be willing to go that far yet. I understand. The NHL is cool sans the labor rhetoric. It's has a glorious history. One none of us wants to see disappear. Just keep in mind that Bettman and Goodenow might be willing to follow my example.
High School Football?
I hate to even mention this, but ESPN2 is televising a high school football game. Isn't this what local cable stations do for programming? We wonder where tomorrow's spoiled athletes come from, but we start giving them national tv coverage, and pressure, long before college. On second thought, maybe we don't wonder.
Lions Diary
Here comes The Pack. Green Bay, fresh off gets run over on Monday night, comes to Ford Field to take on the Lions Sunday. Detroit fans are hoping this is the Lions chance to finish off the Packers once and for all. A loss would be devastating to the Packers playoff hopes and a win would elevate the lion's post-season chances. Some are wondering if a loss would end the current era of Packers' success?
Regardless, a Lions victory would be a big, big win. In some ways, it would mean more than last week's road win vs. Atlanta because the Packers are a division opponent. Beating The Pack, improving their divisional and conference record, while inching closer to a playoff birth of their own? Yeah, it's a stinkin' big game no matter what Green Bay does the rest of the year.
Even with Bret Favre's so-so dome history, I am leery of thinking the Lions can beat the Packers. Call me crazy, but I felt much more confident of beating the Falcons in their home than the Lions dropping the Packers in Detroit. Not that I think it cannot be done, Green Bay has looked putrid and the Lions have been solid, but maybe the old cynical Lions fan in me is speaking up. I've just seen G.B. beat up the Honolulu Blue for too long.
If the Lions hope to win, the ground game will have to step up for Detroit as will Joey Harrington. Artose Pinner is going to need to get 100 yards rushing or very close to that. A touchdown is probably necessary, as well. Harrington will need to spread the ball around and keep the chains moving. I don't know if we can count on Roy Williams to make a great play, so Harrington may have to.
The Lions' front seven has been excellent and will need to continue to be. I love what the LB's did last week. Seems like Teddy Lehman, Alex Lewis and James Davis all had a big play or two. As the DL has been making plays all year, Shaun Rogers and James Hall are having Pro Bowl-type years, it was nice to see the 'backers step up, too.
I'm cautiously optimistic about the game. Not as much as last week, but still hopeful.
Update: The Lions are ranked 11th in Dr. Z's power rankings. Maybe a win away from the top ten?!?!?!
Regardless, a Lions victory would be a big, big win. In some ways, it would mean more than last week's road win vs. Atlanta because the Packers are a division opponent. Beating The Pack, improving their divisional and conference record, while inching closer to a playoff birth of their own? Yeah, it's a stinkin' big game no matter what Green Bay does the rest of the year.
Even with Bret Favre's so-so dome history, I am leery of thinking the Lions can beat the Packers. Call me crazy, but I felt much more confident of beating the Falcons in their home than the Lions dropping the Packers in Detroit. Not that I think it cannot be done, Green Bay has looked putrid and the Lions have been solid, but maybe the old cynical Lions fan in me is speaking up. I've just seen G.B. beat up the Honolulu Blue for too long.
If the Lions hope to win, the ground game will have to step up for Detroit as will Joey Harrington. Artose Pinner is going to need to get 100 yards rushing or very close to that. A touchdown is probably necessary, as well. Harrington will need to spread the ball around and keep the chains moving. I don't know if we can count on Roy Williams to make a great play, so Harrington may have to.
The Lions' front seven has been excellent and will need to continue to be. I love what the LB's did last week. Seems like Teddy Lehman, Alex Lewis and James Davis all had a big play or two. As the DL has been making plays all year, Shaun Rogers and James Hall are having Pro Bowl-type years, it was nice to see the 'backers step up, too.
I'm cautiously optimistic about the game. Not as much as last week, but still hopeful.
Update: The Lions are ranked 11th in Dr. Z's power rankings. Maybe a win away from the top ten?!?!?!
The Greatest Player In The World
If I asked you who was the best baseball player in the world today, right this second, who would be your answer? If you ask me, and I know you haven't, I would take Carlos Beltran of Houston. He's tearing up the playoffs. He's a five tool player living up to all the expectations. I'm not sure how you could take anyone else.
Yeah, Barry Bonds would get some thought. So, too, would Albert Pujols. Do either play defense or run like Beltran? I don't think so. Scott Rolen, when healthy, can hit and catch with anybody, but he can't run like Beltran. Manny Ramirez and Gary Sheffield can outhit 95% of the game, but neither can run or field with Beltran's ability. Vladimir Guerrero, or maybe Alex Rodriguez, may come the closest, but I still like Beltran over both at this second.
I know he's in a contract year, so maybe he gets an asterisk, but Beltran is playing like the best player on Earth. At least he is right this moment. By next week, I may have a new greatest player in the world.
Yeah, Barry Bonds would get some thought. So, too, would Albert Pujols. Do either play defense or run like Beltran? I don't think so. Scott Rolen, when healthy, can hit and catch with anybody, but he can't run like Beltran. Manny Ramirez and Gary Sheffield can outhit 95% of the game, but neither can run or field with Beltran's ability. Vladimir Guerrero, or maybe Alex Rodriguez, may come the closest, but I still like Beltran over both at this second.
I know he's in a contract year, so maybe he gets an asterisk, but Beltran is playing like the best player on Earth. At least he is right this moment. By next week, I may have a new greatest player in the world.
A Great World Series Match-Up
I admit that my Houston versus Boston World Series prediction doesn't look very likely (or smart) right now. However, I would caution everyone that it is still early in both series. I would also like to point out that really almost any combination of the four remaining teams makes for a great World Series.
My Astros vs. Red Sox scenario provides Roger Clemens returning to Fenway Park. It would be a homecoming for ex-Sox farmhand and Astros' legend, Jeff Bagwell. It would provide us with a team that had never even won a playoff series prior to this season and one's whose playoff failings are legendary. Someone would have to succeed. Wouldn't they?
A St. Louis Cardinals vs. Red Sox outcome would be shades of 1946 and 1967. The Cards and Sox met both times for the World Championship. Each series went seven games. The Cards came out with the title on both occasions. It may feature the two best baseball towns in America. What's not to like?
If the Cards face the New York Yankees it would be a 40th anniversary series of their 1964 World Series collision. I may be wrong, but I think the Cardinals have the most World Championships in National League history. We know the Yanks have the most overall. The series would ooze baseball tradition and feature two great lineups.
An Astros vs. Yankees series would have Roger Clemens returning to Yankee Stadium, the place he "retired" from. I'm sure the Yankee faithful would welcome The Rocket back with open arms. It would be a battle of a team with more post-season success ever against one with no post-season success prior to two weeks ago. An underdog scenario if there ever was one.
So, even if I am wrong (yet, again), the World Series should still be great baseball. Besides, I should get some credit for getting the first round of playoffs predicted correctly.
My Astros vs. Red Sox scenario provides Roger Clemens returning to Fenway Park. It would be a homecoming for ex-Sox farmhand and Astros' legend, Jeff Bagwell. It would provide us with a team that had never even won a playoff series prior to this season and one's whose playoff failings are legendary. Someone would have to succeed. Wouldn't they?
A St. Louis Cardinals vs. Red Sox outcome would be shades of 1946 and 1967. The Cards and Sox met both times for the World Championship. Each series went seven games. The Cards came out with the title on both occasions. It may feature the two best baseball towns in America. What's not to like?
If the Cards face the New York Yankees it would be a 40th anniversary series of their 1964 World Series collision. I may be wrong, but I think the Cardinals have the most World Championships in National League history. We know the Yanks have the most overall. The series would ooze baseball tradition and feature two great lineups.
An Astros vs. Yankees series would have Roger Clemens returning to Yankee Stadium, the place he "retired" from. I'm sure the Yankee faithful would welcome The Rocket back with open arms. It would be a battle of a team with more post-season success ever against one with no post-season success prior to two weeks ago. An underdog scenario if there ever was one.
So, even if I am wrong (yet, again), the World Series should still be great baseball. Besides, I should get some credit for getting the first round of playoffs predicted correctly.
U.S. Advances
The U.S. men's national soccer team rolled over Panama 6-0. The win secures a birth in the next round of qualification for the 2006 World Cup. Landon Donovan, who I am liking more and more at midfield as opposed to forward, scored the first two U.S. goals. Eddie Johnson, who just got his first international tally Saturday, netted a natural hat trick.
I love to see the young U.S. forwards, like Johnson and Brian Ching, emerge. It gives the team more depth, more scoring ability (which they need more of to compete at the highest level) and allows Donovan to move into a midfield spot where he certainly looks more comfortable. Donovan may be the best U.S. player and he gets far more touches in midfield than at forward. While I am no soccer expert, that seems like a good idea.
The win over Panama may not be like winning a World Cup game, but you can't do that unless you make the field for Germany '06. Last night's victory puts the United States one step closer to that end.
I love to see the young U.S. forwards, like Johnson and Brian Ching, emerge. It gives the team more depth, more scoring ability (which they need more of to compete at the highest level) and allows Donovan to move into a midfield spot where he certainly looks more comfortable. Donovan may be the best U.S. player and he gets far more touches in midfield than at forward. While I am no soccer expert, that seems like a good idea.
The win over Panama may not be like winning a World Cup game, but you can't do that unless you make the field for Germany '06. Last night's victory puts the United States one step closer to that end.
Monday, October 11, 2004
It's Go Time
The countdown to the first pitch is down to less than twenty-four hours. The series everyone has been waiting for is less than a day away. It's Red Sox vs. Yankees in the American League Championship Series.
It's plain and simple. This is baseball's best rivalry, one sided as it has been. It's is arguably the best confrontation in all of sports. It's the same two teams, playing in the same league, in the same division, wearing the same style uniforms, playing in basically the same ballparks for almost 100 years. (Yeah, yeah, I know all about The House That Ruth Built and it's remodeling, but give me some literary leeway here.)
It's Joe DiMaggio and Ted Williams. It's Lou Gehrig and Jimmie Foxx. It's Thurman Munson and Carlton Fisk. It's Derek Jeter and Nomar Garciaparra. It's Pedro Martinez tossing aside Don Zimmer and Reggie Jackson's shouting match with Billy Martin in Boston's dugout. It's Denny Doyle and Brian Doyle. It's Carl Yastrzemski and Bucky Dent. Of course, it's tons of Babe Ruth, too. It's the history of the sport rolled up into two franchises.
It's big business, big headlines, big contracts and big egos. It's free agent signings and blockbuster trades. It's every sticky-sweet, melodramatic baseball prose ever written about autumn evenings, David versus Goliath and the cycle of life, but it's all true. The series cannot possibly live up to the hype, but, for a change, the hype may be warranted.
The Sox were the team from 1900-1918. The Yankees have dominated since and dealt Boston a number of historic setbacks along the way. Of course, the Sox have offered up some of their own improbable losses without the Yankees assistance. However, it's those near-misses against New York that have united Red Sox Nation and given this battle it's backdrop.
The history of their regular season clashes for the American League pennant have been joined, in this wild card era, by post-season games featuring baseball's most heated rivals. Now, instead of one team staying home during the playoffs, they can meet in a best of seven series to crown the winner of the American League. It's ten times the pressure, ten times the hype, ten times more fun.
Tomorrow another chapter between the sport's most written about franchises begins. I think we are all ready. Let's get it on.
It's plain and simple. This is baseball's best rivalry, one sided as it has been. It's is arguably the best confrontation in all of sports. It's the same two teams, playing in the same league, in the same division, wearing the same style uniforms, playing in basically the same ballparks for almost 100 years. (Yeah, yeah, I know all about The House That Ruth Built and it's remodeling, but give me some literary leeway here.)
It's Joe DiMaggio and Ted Williams. It's Lou Gehrig and Jimmie Foxx. It's Thurman Munson and Carlton Fisk. It's Derek Jeter and Nomar Garciaparra. It's Pedro Martinez tossing aside Don Zimmer and Reggie Jackson's shouting match with Billy Martin in Boston's dugout. It's Denny Doyle and Brian Doyle. It's Carl Yastrzemski and Bucky Dent. Of course, it's tons of Babe Ruth, too. It's the history of the sport rolled up into two franchises.
It's big business, big headlines, big contracts and big egos. It's free agent signings and blockbuster trades. It's every sticky-sweet, melodramatic baseball prose ever written about autumn evenings, David versus Goliath and the cycle of life, but it's all true. The series cannot possibly live up to the hype, but, for a change, the hype may be warranted.
The Sox were the team from 1900-1918. The Yankees have dominated since and dealt Boston a number of historic setbacks along the way. Of course, the Sox have offered up some of their own improbable losses without the Yankees assistance. However, it's those near-misses against New York that have united Red Sox Nation and given this battle it's backdrop.
The history of their regular season clashes for the American League pennant have been joined, in this wild card era, by post-season games featuring baseball's most heated rivals. Now, instead of one team staying home during the playoffs, they can meet in a best of seven series to crown the winner of the American League. It's ten times the pressure, ten times the hype, ten times more fun.
Tomorrow another chapter between the sport's most written about franchises begins. I think we are all ready. Let's get it on.
Caminiti's Death
I, like most baseball fans, was saddened to hear that former MVP Ken Caminiti died of a heart attack at age 41. The definition of hard-nosed ballplayer, Caminiti had battle substance abuse and personal demons for years. His life was far too short.
B.B. Baker's Dozen
Oh, let's face it. Nobody has any idea who to rank after number two. Well, that's a bit untrue. Miami is clearly third, even though they look prime for a loss, so the top three are simple. However, four through thirteen are anyone's guess. After a couple of days of thought, here's my guess at college football's top 13.
1. Southern Cal- Solid win vs. Cal
2. Oklahoma- Peterson is THE man.
3. Miami- Here is where the poll gets fuzzy.
4. Utah- Yeah, I know. It's Utah. But no one else can maintain this spot.
5. Auburn- The SEC's top team. This week.
6. Purdue- Orton and Co. squeak past Penn State.
7. Viriginia- The poll gets even fuzzier.
8. Florida State- 'Noles on the move up, again.
9. Georgia- The up-and-down Dawgs are down this week.
10. Texas- Can't pass. Can't beat OU, either.
11. California- Tough loss to 'SC.
12. (tie) Michigan and Wisconsin- Your choice of Big Ten school here.
13. Tennessee- Win at UGA puts Vols back in poll. Barely.
1. Southern Cal- Solid win vs. Cal
2. Oklahoma- Peterson is THE man.
3. Miami- Here is where the poll gets fuzzy.
4. Utah- Yeah, I know. It's Utah. But no one else can maintain this spot.
5. Auburn- The SEC's top team. This week.
6. Purdue- Orton and Co. squeak past Penn State.
7. Viriginia- The poll gets even fuzzier.
8. Florida State- 'Noles on the move up, again.
9. Georgia- The up-and-down Dawgs are down this week.
10. Texas- Can't pass. Can't beat OU, either.
11. California- Tough loss to 'SC.
12. (tie) Michigan and Wisconsin- Your choice of Big Ten school here.
13. Tennessee- Win at UGA puts Vols back in poll. Barely.
Sunday, October 10, 2004
Lions Diary
See, I thought the Lions could do it. Every once in a while I am right. Today was one of those days. The Falcons played like I expected, as did Detroit. It was ugly, but I will gladly take a second road win. The Lions are now 3-1.
The injuires continue to mount, though. The loss of Roy Williams being the biggest. Williams' ankle injury will really hurt the Lions offense in the weeks to come. (It won't help my fantasy league team, either.) However, a win is a win.
The injuires continue to mount, though. The loss of Roy Williams being the biggest. Williams' ankle injury will really hurt the Lions offense in the weeks to come. (It won't help my fantasy league team, either.) However, a win is a win.
Saturday, October 09, 2004
Soccer Night In El Salvador
The U.S. Men's National Team has just won a World Cup Qualifier in El Salvador 2-0. Brian McBride and Ed Johnson tallied for the U.S. Very nice road win for the U.S. Next up is Panama Wednesday night at RFK.
New Kids On Campus
If you've been around here at all, and if you have you are probably alone, you may have noted my general disdain for the "freshman can't contribute" line most college coaches hand out. Not that it doesn't prove true, but it's hardly 100% accurate as they make it sound. Coaches would have us believe these first-year kids are just slightly above worthless. Yet, I doubt many want to go back to freshmen ineligibility.
In light of this, I offer the following moderately sarcastic observations from Saturday's big games.
Tennessee beats Georgia? That can't be right. Freshman QB's can't win big games on the road. Yet, Vols' QB Erik Ainge played his first ever road contest, in Georgia no less, and walked out with a win. David Greene, a pre-season Heisman contender and senior, has a lackluster game for UGA, but Ainge guides UT to a huge conference win. Casey Clausen must have played, not Ainge.
Chad Henne continues to improve. Wait, that can't be right, either. Another TRUE freshman quarterback guides his team to a win against a top twenty, conference opponent? Freshman rarely make an impact, especially at the big programs. Henne could not have thrown for over 300 yards versus Minnesota. You can't trust a freshman in a big game, everyone knows that.
Oklahoma runs over Texas, 12-0. Adrian Peterson runs himself into the Heisman race by going over, around and through the Longhorns. Wait, Peterson can't be in the Heisman hunt, he's a true freshman. Freshman aren't supposed to be key contributors. They certainly cannot be considered the best player in the country.
I know the best thing about freshman is that they become sophomores. If that's true, I guess we will have quite a Heisman race in 2005.
In light of this, I offer the following moderately sarcastic observations from Saturday's big games.
Tennessee beats Georgia? That can't be right. Freshman QB's can't win big games on the road. Yet, Vols' QB Erik Ainge played his first ever road contest, in Georgia no less, and walked out with a win. David Greene, a pre-season Heisman contender and senior, has a lackluster game for UGA, but Ainge guides UT to a huge conference win. Casey Clausen must have played, not Ainge.
Chad Henne continues to improve. Wait, that can't be right, either. Another TRUE freshman quarterback guides his team to a win against a top twenty, conference opponent? Freshman rarely make an impact, especially at the big programs. Henne could not have thrown for over 300 yards versus Minnesota. You can't trust a freshman in a big game, everyone knows that.
Oklahoma runs over Texas, 12-0. Adrian Peterson runs himself into the Heisman race by going over, around and through the Longhorns. Wait, Peterson can't be in the Heisman hunt, he's a true freshman. Freshman aren't supposed to be key contributors. They certainly cannot be considered the best player in the country.
I know the best thing about freshman is that they become sophomores. If that's true, I guess we will have quite a Heisman race in 2005.
Lions Diary
I haven't had much to say about the Honolulu Blue and Silver, but the boys had last week off and there's been a ton of other sporting events to keep my short attention span occupied. However, tomorrow the Lions lineup against the Atlanta Falcons. Some in town, and many across the land, think the Falcons are in a prime spot to cream Detroit. Maybe I'm a homer, maybe too darn ignorant, or both, but I'm just not too worried about ATL.
Let's have one understanding, though. Michael Vick scares everyone. That includes me, but I'm still not overly impressed by his teammates. Sure, the Lions have way too many injuries to name and they are probably an 8-8 team in the making, but I still think they've got a chance Sunday. Again, it could just be I'm plain crazy, but I don't see why the Lions are so inferior to ATL.
A Falcons win won't surprise me. Neither will a Lions "W".
Let's have one understanding, though. Michael Vick scares everyone. That includes me, but I'm still not overly impressed by his teammates. Sure, the Lions have way too many injuries to name and they are probably an 8-8 team in the making, but I still think they've got a chance Sunday. Again, it could just be I'm plain crazy, but I don't see why the Lions are so inferior to ATL.
A Falcons win won't surprise me. Neither will a Lions "W".
Friday, October 08, 2004
Slippin' Sammy
Anybody want Sammy Sosa? Anybody? Four or five years ago, Sosa was untouchable. He was one of baseball's premier stars. He was one of the game's most dangerous hitters, a former MVP, and a top gate attraction. He was part of everything that was good about baseball. Oh, how things have changed.
Sosa's season long run-in with manager Dusty Baker have taken the luster off the former golden child. He now looks more like pouter than player. Of course, his premature departure in the middle of Game 162 only helped further that image.
His decline at the plate, coming in the same season that MLB tested for illegal substances, has added fuel to Sosa's rumored steroid use. It's not unreasonable for people to question just how much of Sosa's prolific output was due to ability and how much came as a result of enhanced Juicy Juice? Or that enhanced bat? Or both?
Due $17 million next year, the Cubs would probably love to move Slammin' Sammy along. However, if traded, Sosa would be guaranteed another $18 million for the following year. $35 million for two years for an aging, pouting star with declining numbers? Few general managers are going to look kindly on that deal.
In 1999, I doubt any G.M. would have passed on grabbing Sosa. Now, completely redefined as a quitter who can't produce huge numbers without a pharmacist, Oprah would have a tough time giving away Sosa and his big contact. The mighty do fall. Sometimes very quickly.
Sosa's season long run-in with manager Dusty Baker have taken the luster off the former golden child. He now looks more like pouter than player. Of course, his premature departure in the middle of Game 162 only helped further that image.
His decline at the plate, coming in the same season that MLB tested for illegal substances, has added fuel to Sosa's rumored steroid use. It's not unreasonable for people to question just how much of Sosa's prolific output was due to ability and how much came as a result of enhanced Juicy Juice? Or that enhanced bat? Or both?
Due $17 million next year, the Cubs would probably love to move Slammin' Sammy along. However, if traded, Sosa would be guaranteed another $18 million for the following year. $35 million for two years for an aging, pouting star with declining numbers? Few general managers are going to look kindly on that deal.
In 1999, I doubt any G.M. would have passed on grabbing Sosa. Now, completely redefined as a quitter who can't produce huge numbers without a pharmacist, Oprah would have a tough time giving away Sosa and his big contact. The mighty do fall. Sometimes very quickly.
Wednesday, October 06, 2004
Tiger Ties The Knot
Unless you've been on the moon over the last week, you may have heard something about Tiger Woods getting married. Apparently, the third ranked golfer in the world did indeed tie the knot Tuesday. I would like to wish Tiger and his wife, Elin, a long, happy and healthy life together. (I'm still trying to figure out a gift.)
I'd also like to thank the couple for actually getting married, thus ending relentless speculation about their impending nuptials. The sports media acted more like The Star or People magazine at thought of golf's top attraction marrying. I had grown weary of the coverage. So what? A golfing legend gets married to his longtime girlfriend? This is sports news? If it got any coverage at all, and I respect the Woods' desire for privacy, it should have been from E! not ESPN. Yet, there it was each day in my morning sports section.
Thankfully, Tiger and Elin are married and the rumors and coverage of their marriage can now be replaced by actual sport stories. Maybe something more important to sports fans? Like Ontario Hockey League scores.
I'd also like to thank the couple for actually getting married, thus ending relentless speculation about their impending nuptials. The sports media acted more like The Star or People magazine at thought of golf's top attraction marrying. I had grown weary of the coverage. So what? A golfing legend gets married to his longtime girlfriend? This is sports news? If it got any coverage at all, and I respect the Woods' desire for privacy, it should have been from E! not ESPN. Yet, there it was each day in my morning sports section.
Thankfully, Tiger and Elin are married and the rumors and coverage of their marriage can now be replaced by actual sport stories. Maybe something more important to sports fans? Like Ontario Hockey League scores.
Make Mine A Double
Michigan State University is attempting to crack down on excessive drinking at tailgate parties and instituted some new rules towards that end. Fans, of course, are in an uproar. Some of the Spartans' fans concerns are legit. (Traffic issues are one example.) Others just seem more pre-occupied with tailgating than Spartan football.
This is obsession with pre-game partying is not limited to East Lansing. The way "fans" complain each time an opportunity to consume alcohol is altered, at any sporting event, there is an outcry. Sometimes, I really do wonder what sports, and football in particular, would be like if alcohol and gambling were removed.
Would attendance drop? If so, how much? If you refused to attend a game because alcohol wasn't being served are you a sports fan or an alcohol fan? If you cannot attend a game without your favorite adult beverage in hand, perhaps, (and this is just a suggestion) you might have a teeny, tiny, little problem.
This is obsession with pre-game partying is not limited to East Lansing. The way "fans" complain each time an opportunity to consume alcohol is altered, at any sporting event, there is an outcry. Sometimes, I really do wonder what sports, and football in particular, would be like if alcohol and gambling were removed.
Would attendance drop? If so, how much? If you refused to attend a game because alcohol wasn't being served are you a sports fan or an alcohol fan? If you cannot attend a game without your favorite adult beverage in hand, perhaps, (and this is just a suggestion) you might have a teeny, tiny, little problem.
Sunday, October 03, 2004
MLB Playoff Predictions
Borrowing a notion from the Heels, Sox and Steelers blog, this loser is going to try and pick some baseball winners. I have little chance of being correct, even as a baseball geek, but here goes.
I like the New York Yankees over the Minnesota Twins. The Yanks pitching does have problems, but can the Twins get wins out of anyone other than Johan Santana? I like Brad Radke, but Gary Sheffield, Jorge Posada, Derek Jeter (remember when he was so awful in April?) and Alex Rodriguez can pound the baseball. Even if Yankee starters falter, they should be able to hit their way to a series win.
My head says take Anaheim. They are on fire and just put away Oakland's fine starting rotation. However, my heart thinks Boston is going to find a way to win. The key is Pedro Martinez. I assume Curt Schilling will win his starts, so if the Sox #2 starter can pitch like his former #1 self, the Red Sox will advance. If not, this will go the limit and then either team can win. Obviously, I think Pedro will pitch well.
In the National League, I'll take St. Louis over Los Angeles. I have no idea how L.A. got here, but I do feel they will push the Cards. Why? Because they have defied logic all year. What's another week or two? St. Louis should have enough offense to batter the Dodgers starters and thus avoid facing Eric Gagne.
I'm going with Houston over Atlanta. I love what the Braves have done this year. I can't say a Braves win would surprise me, but I just like the Astros right now. Of course, I hate their chances in mid-August, but it's not August anymore.
There you have my first round guesses. It will be another Yankees vs. Red Sox ALCS and Cardinals vs. Astros NLCS. Guessing a World Series match-up from this, I'll take Boston versus Houston. If I'm not right, it won't be the first time.
I like the New York Yankees over the Minnesota Twins. The Yanks pitching does have problems, but can the Twins get wins out of anyone other than Johan Santana? I like Brad Radke, but Gary Sheffield, Jorge Posada, Derek Jeter (remember when he was so awful in April?) and Alex Rodriguez can pound the baseball. Even if Yankee starters falter, they should be able to hit their way to a series win.
My head says take Anaheim. They are on fire and just put away Oakland's fine starting rotation. However, my heart thinks Boston is going to find a way to win. The key is Pedro Martinez. I assume Curt Schilling will win his starts, so if the Sox #2 starter can pitch like his former #1 self, the Red Sox will advance. If not, this will go the limit and then either team can win. Obviously, I think Pedro will pitch well.
In the National League, I'll take St. Louis over Los Angeles. I have no idea how L.A. got here, but I do feel they will push the Cards. Why? Because they have defied logic all year. What's another week or two? St. Louis should have enough offense to batter the Dodgers starters and thus avoid facing Eric Gagne.
I'm going with Houston over Atlanta. I love what the Braves have done this year. I can't say a Braves win would surprise me, but I just like the Astros right now. Of course, I hate their chances in mid-August, but it's not August anymore.
There you have my first round guesses. It will be another Yankees vs. Red Sox ALCS and Cardinals vs. Astros NLCS. Guessing a World Series match-up from this, I'll take Boston versus Houston. If I'm not right, it won't be the first time.
I Have Bad News, Ty
Urban Meyer, Utah's football coach, has an interesting clause in his contract. Here are the details I found most enlightening according to Matt Hayes of The Sporting News and Fox Sports.com:
Let's flip the reality switch: When his contract was restructured after last season, one of the tradeoffs Utah included was a significantly lower buyout clause (to $250,000) for Meyer. He is allowed to leave for any of three schools (Notre Dame, Ohio State and Michigan) without adhering to the clause, and -- here's the key -- he can change one of those schools during the length of the contract. Agents don't add such stipulations in contracts without an eye on the future.
Now, I don't think Jim Tressel is going anywhere soon, so the OSU job is not an option. There is a rumor that Lloyd Carr might be thinking of retirement. Well, lots of people, some of them in their twenties, think about retiring. Doing it is another thing. The odds of Michigan's job opening up soon would seem like 10% tops. However, there is one other school on that list that seems far more likely.
I realize Ty Willingham's Irish have looked better this year, but Willingham's on the hot seat and we all know it. He knows it, too. The Michigan win bought him some time, but the Purdue thrashing at South Bend will rekindle the "Ty Must Go" talk. Would anyone be surprised if come January 1 or sooner, the Irish are looking for a new head football coach? Would there be any better choice than Meyer, who has ND on his dream job list?
He could do for Notre Dame what Bob Stoops has done at Oklahoma or Pete Carroll has done at USC. He could re-energize the entire program. He could make ND a national power once again. However, Notre Dame is not alone. There are a number of schools, including a few dormant super powers, that could use Meyer right now. Can you say Penn State?
I suspect a few movers and shakers at traditional powers that are still playing well, like Texas and maybe even Michigan, allow themselves a second or two to ponder what Meyer would do at their program.
Meyer's desire to move up will put pressure on coaches at big time programs to succeed and force school administrators to consider firing their current coach in order to land college football's hottest coaching prospect before someone else does.
Let's flip the reality switch: When his contract was restructured after last season, one of the tradeoffs Utah included was a significantly lower buyout clause (to $250,000) for Meyer. He is allowed to leave for any of three schools (Notre Dame, Ohio State and Michigan) without adhering to the clause, and -- here's the key -- he can change one of those schools during the length of the contract. Agents don't add such stipulations in contracts without an eye on the future.
Now, I don't think Jim Tressel is going anywhere soon, so the OSU job is not an option. There is a rumor that Lloyd Carr might be thinking of retirement. Well, lots of people, some of them in their twenties, think about retiring. Doing it is another thing. The odds of Michigan's job opening up soon would seem like 10% tops. However, there is one other school on that list that seems far more likely.
I realize Ty Willingham's Irish have looked better this year, but Willingham's on the hot seat and we all know it. He knows it, too. The Michigan win bought him some time, but the Purdue thrashing at South Bend will rekindle the "Ty Must Go" talk. Would anyone be surprised if come January 1 or sooner, the Irish are looking for a new head football coach? Would there be any better choice than Meyer, who has ND on his dream job list?
He could do for Notre Dame what Bob Stoops has done at Oklahoma or Pete Carroll has done at USC. He could re-energize the entire program. He could make ND a national power once again. However, Notre Dame is not alone. There are a number of schools, including a few dormant super powers, that could use Meyer right now. Can you say Penn State?
I suspect a few movers and shakers at traditional powers that are still playing well, like Texas and maybe even Michigan, allow themselves a second or two to ponder what Meyer would do at their program.
Meyer's desire to move up will put pressure on coaches at big time programs to succeed and force school administrators to consider firing their current coach in order to land college football's hottest coaching prospect before someone else does.
B.B. Baker's Dozen
West Viriginia, Tennessee, Fresno State and Louisiana State and Ohio State all left my top 13. The Mountaineers, Vols and Buckeyes all have a chance to return. LSU's second loss most likely eliminates them from re-entering the title hunt. Fresno probably won't as their strength of schedule will not help them.
The top five remain the same, but that will change this week as more conference collisions will lead to upheveal in my poll.
1. Southern Cal- No reason to leave the top spot.
2. Oklahoma- Lackluster game vs. Tech a result of U.T. being next on the schedule.
3. Miami- A typical Miami game. I just get the feeling they aren't going undefeated.
4. Georgia- The Dawgs finally showed up. Dismissed LSU in impressive fashion.
5. Texas- It's all about OU.
6. Utah- The Utes climb as others fall.
7. California- It's time for USC. Is it Cal's biggest game ever?
8. Auburn- Beat up Tennessee in Knoxville.
9. Purdue- Orton leads the way.
10. Virginia- Benefited from all the upsets.
11. Florida State- Seminoles return. Can they stay?
12. Florida- I still like Chris Leak.
13. Minnesota- Gophers visit Ann Arbor Saturday.
There will be a mini-Heisman Bowl in Texas this week. The Longhorns' Cedric Benson is probably number two in the Heisman chase, it belongs to Kyle Orton right now, but Benson will take on the defending winner, Oklahoma's Jason White Saturday. If either post big numbers in a win, they will close the gap on Orton.
I may be on an island with this thought, but Sooners' freshman Adrain Peterson can also make a case for player of the year with a strong showing (and an OU win). No doubt that White is one of the best QBs in the country, but the Sooners are riding Peterson's legs more than White's arm to this point.
The top five remain the same, but that will change this week as more conference collisions will lead to upheveal in my poll.
1. Southern Cal- No reason to leave the top spot.
2. Oklahoma- Lackluster game vs. Tech a result of U.T. being next on the schedule.
3. Miami- A typical Miami game. I just get the feeling they aren't going undefeated.
4. Georgia- The Dawgs finally showed up. Dismissed LSU in impressive fashion.
5. Texas- It's all about OU.
6. Utah- The Utes climb as others fall.
7. California- It's time for USC. Is it Cal's biggest game ever?
8. Auburn- Beat up Tennessee in Knoxville.
9. Purdue- Orton leads the way.
10. Virginia- Benefited from all the upsets.
11. Florida State- Seminoles return. Can they stay?
12. Florida- I still like Chris Leak.
13. Minnesota- Gophers visit Ann Arbor Saturday.
There will be a mini-Heisman Bowl in Texas this week. The Longhorns' Cedric Benson is probably number two in the Heisman chase, it belongs to Kyle Orton right now, but Benson will take on the defending winner, Oklahoma's Jason White Saturday. If either post big numbers in a win, they will close the gap on Orton.
I may be on an island with this thought, but Sooners' freshman Adrain Peterson can also make a case for player of the year with a strong showing (and an OU win). No doubt that White is one of the best QBs in the country, but the Sooners are riding Peterson's legs more than White's arm to this point.
Saturday, October 02, 2004
Go, 'Stros, Go!
I'm rooting for the Houston Astros to win the National League Wild Card. After today's win and San Francisco's loss (I still don't know how Los Angeles wins), the Astros need only to win tomorrow to make the playoffs. Like many others, I wrote the Astros off quite a while ago. At the time, things looked pretty bad for Houston. Andy Pettitte was done, Roger Clemens was hurting and I couldn't see Carlos Beltran alone keeping them afloat. He didn't have to.
Jeff Bagwell, Lance Berkman, Roy Oswalt and Clemens cranked it up a notch and the Astros have been on an unbelievable roll. Tomorrow they can complete their spectacular rebound. I hope they do.
Jeff Bagwell, Lance Berkman, Roy Oswalt and Clemens cranked it up a notch and the Astros have been on an unbelievable roll. Tomorrow they can complete their spectacular rebound. I hope they do.
Friday, October 01, 2004
Lions Diary
No game for the Detroit Lions this week, but WR Roy Williams did get some notice. As did kick returner Eddie Drummond (here).
Ichiro Inches Closer
Ichiro Suzuki is probably going to break the all-time hit record for one season. He needs one hit to tie George Sisler's mark and two to pass him by. I know many baseball fans who yawn at this acheivement. It's not as exciting as a home run title, but getting over 257 hits in 162 games is darn impressive.
It wasn't that long ago many wondered if Ichiro would even be a good MLB player. I guess we've gotten that cleared up for good.
It wasn't that long ago many wondered if Ichiro would even be a good MLB player. I guess we've gotten that cleared up for good.
Top Tough Guys
Curt Sylvester, the Detroit Free Press Lions' beat writer, offers this list of the top NFL tough guys of the last twenty-five years. This was done in light of the Tony Siragusa/Joey Harrington comments and counter-comments.
An all-time list would be even more challenging. Mostly because it would be hard to only have a top 10. Dick Butkus, Doug Atkins, Mike Curtis, Sam Huff, Joe Schmidt, Chuck Bednarik, Pat Fischer (why is he not in the Hall of Fame?) would all have to be considered. Guys on Slyvester's list, like Lewis, Lambert, Taylor and Lott, would also be in the running for my all-time tough guy top ten.
An all-time list would be even more challenging. Mostly because it would be hard to only have a top 10. Dick Butkus, Doug Atkins, Mike Curtis, Sam Huff, Joe Schmidt, Chuck Bednarik, Pat Fischer (why is he not in the Hall of Fame?) would all have to be considered. Guys on Slyvester's list, like Lewis, Lambert, Taylor and Lott, would also be in the running for my all-time tough guy top ten.
Tuesday, September 28, 2004
College Hoops Polls
Over at the College Basketball Blog, Yoni has posted a chart listing a number of media outlet's pre-season rankings. Here is a link to the list.
Did You Get A Ring With That?
Last night, the Boston Red Sox clinched a berth in the post-season. The Red Sox secured their shot at the elusive World Series title by capturing the American League's Wild Card. However, by all accounts the Sox partied like, well, like they had won something.
Sure, many of the Sox offered up the traditional "We haven't done anything yet" speech, but that makes me wonder if they have poured champagne and beer all over each other after every victory this year? Because if they haven't, what's up with the party? (If they have partied like this all year, they are lucky to still be standing let alone winning games.) Securing your second place finish behind your long-time rivals, the New York Yankees, hardly seems party-worthy.
If the Sox were the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, their opponents last evening, and the D-Rays had made the post-season for the first time in franchise history, I would have spotted them a party. However, these Red Sox were built to win playoff games, not celebrate Wild Card clinchers. Having a party for such a non-event seems wrong. If they lose anywhere prior to the World Series it will seem even more laughable. (Trust me, Yankee fans are laughing right now. Really loud, too.)
Yeah, I'm probably making too much out of it. I readily admit to having a soft spot for the Red Sox. (Maybe it's the same reason I am a Detroit Lions fan. It's a misery loves company thing.) Maybe I'm just too darn cynical. What's a little alcohol and loud music anyway? Nothing really, I'd just prefer seeing the Sox do this in late October not late September.
Sure, many of the Sox offered up the traditional "We haven't done anything yet" speech, but that makes me wonder if they have poured champagne and beer all over each other after every victory this year? Because if they haven't, what's up with the party? (If they have partied like this all year, they are lucky to still be standing let alone winning games.) Securing your second place finish behind your long-time rivals, the New York Yankees, hardly seems party-worthy.
If the Sox were the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, their opponents last evening, and the D-Rays had made the post-season for the first time in franchise history, I would have spotted them a party. However, these Red Sox were built to win playoff games, not celebrate Wild Card clinchers. Having a party for such a non-event seems wrong. If they lose anywhere prior to the World Series it will seem even more laughable. (Trust me, Yankee fans are laughing right now. Really loud, too.)
Yeah, I'm probably making too much out of it. I readily admit to having a soft spot for the Red Sox. (Maybe it's the same reason I am a Detroit Lions fan. It's a misery loves company thing.) Maybe I'm just too darn cynical. What's a little alcohol and loud music anyway? Nothing really, I'd just prefer seeing the Sox do this in late October not late September.
Racing To Oblivion
Society seems to love a race. We run in races. Everything from a one hundred meter dash to a marathon. We skate and ski to see who will finish first. We bet races. The dog and ponies get wagered on each day. Mankind puts his transportation into action as well. We race all forms of bicycles, motorcycles, snowmobiles, boats and cars. Yet, I was still amazed at what I witnessed Sunday.
While flipping through television stations, I stumbled across a form of racing I didn't know existed. Lawn mower racing. Yes, that's right. Lawn mowers. No, no. Not the push kind. The riding variety. A rather large group of individuals were zipping around the course, complete with safety helmets, on lawn mowers to see who would win.
At first, I was just plain stupefied at the thought this idea had grown beyond a contest between drunken neighbors. It was an actual event. These guys were racing riding lawn mowers on a designed course. The longer I watched, and it wasn't for more than about five minutes, the more a second thought occurred to me.
What on Earth was this doing on television? Sure, go ahead. Race lawn mowers, if you want. You and your buddies want to crack a keg and tool around to see who wins, I'm all for it. But whose bright idea was it to put it on tv?
I'll admit, it probably got better ratings than the NHL, but just how desperate are we for programming? I realize it's Sunday afternoon and nothing is going to come close to NFL ratings, but I can't see under any circumstance broadcasting lawn mower racing. (Ok, the drunk thing might be one condition.) If we needed anymore proof that ESPN had "jumped the shark", this was it.
Then, I got scared. What if this is a pro league? What if this is only one stop on their season long tour? What if the drivers have endorsement deals with Toro, Briggs and Stratton and John Deere? There's got to be prize money, right? How much? If it's more than 50% of us earn in a year, I may lose it. That's when I changed the channel.
Afterwards, I was pondering what else could this lead to? If ESPN, albeit ESPN2, is willing to give up airtime to lawn mowers, why not edgers? How about the all-time classic battle between drop and broadcast spreaders? That would make for one heck of a race. Hey, if lawn mowers got on cable tv, wheelbarrel racing, a long standing American tradition, should be on network television.
If I recall correctly, Rome fell, in part, due to it's obsession with games. When we find lawn mower racing on television we should all start to worry about our nation's future.
While flipping through television stations, I stumbled across a form of racing I didn't know existed. Lawn mower racing. Yes, that's right. Lawn mowers. No, no. Not the push kind. The riding variety. A rather large group of individuals were zipping around the course, complete with safety helmets, on lawn mowers to see who would win.
At first, I was just plain stupefied at the thought this idea had grown beyond a contest between drunken neighbors. It was an actual event. These guys were racing riding lawn mowers on a designed course. The longer I watched, and it wasn't for more than about five minutes, the more a second thought occurred to me.
What on Earth was this doing on television? Sure, go ahead. Race lawn mowers, if you want. You and your buddies want to crack a keg and tool around to see who wins, I'm all for it. But whose bright idea was it to put it on tv?
I'll admit, it probably got better ratings than the NHL, but just how desperate are we for programming? I realize it's Sunday afternoon and nothing is going to come close to NFL ratings, but I can't see under any circumstance broadcasting lawn mower racing. (Ok, the drunk thing might be one condition.) If we needed anymore proof that ESPN had "jumped the shark", this was it.
Then, I got scared. What if this is a pro league? What if this is only one stop on their season long tour? What if the drivers have endorsement deals with Toro, Briggs and Stratton and John Deere? There's got to be prize money, right? How much? If it's more than 50% of us earn in a year, I may lose it. That's when I changed the channel.
Afterwards, I was pondering what else could this lead to? If ESPN, albeit ESPN2, is willing to give up airtime to lawn mowers, why not edgers? How about the all-time classic battle between drop and broadcast spreaders? That would make for one heck of a race. Hey, if lawn mowers got on cable tv, wheelbarrel racing, a long standing American tradition, should be on network television.
If I recall correctly, Rome fell, in part, due to it's obsession with games. When we find lawn mower racing on television we should all start to worry about our nation's future.
Lions Diary
In case you haven't heard, the big story in Detroit sports right now is what Fox Sports' Tony Siragusa said about Joey Harrington during the game Sunday. Here's a link to the Detroit Free Press story getting into all the details. Basically, the ex-NFL defensive lineman questioned Harrington's manhood. Indirectly, of course.
Instead of taking the low road here, I'll just say that Mitch Albom sums up my thoughts pretty well with his column. (I should point out that Albom rarely shares my sentiments on anything, which I'm sure would please him.)
Instead of taking the low road here, I'll just say that Mitch Albom sums up my thoughts pretty well with his column. (I should point out that Albom rarely shares my sentiments on anything, which I'm sure would please him.)
Is Anybody Clean?
Just when you think doping scandals in sports can't get any worse, they do. Here's a brief story about some Paralympians that tested positive for banned substances.
Sunday, September 26, 2004
Lions Diary
It was over almost before it began. The Philadelphia Eagles showed the Lions' faithful why they are Super Bowl contenders. I didn't get to see any of the first half, but it was 7-0 Eagles when I turned my radio on, 14-0 shortly after and 21-0 when I decided I would turn the radio off and watch what was left when I got home.
When the tv went on, it was 27-7 Eagles and about the only positive thing I gleaned was that Philadelphia kicker Jeff Akers was having a good day. He started on my fantasy team this week. The final was a disappointing 30-13 score. I never expected a Super Bowl run from the Detroit football team, but I would have preferred a closer game against a quality opponent.
Of course, there was one other huge good sign for me and the Lions. Roy Williams was having his best day yet. The rookie wide receiver caught nine passes for 135 yards and scored both Lions' touchdowns. I started him on my fantasy team, too. More importantly, the Lions may actually have their first great offensive player since Barry Sanders retired and their best receiver since Herman Moore's glory days.
The game itself was never really that much of a contest, so I don't think I'll dwell on it. Philadelphia is very good and no one should be too surprised the Lions got slapped around. I heard Kevin Jones' was injured, so that will concern all of Lions' Country. They must have him back and healthy. Hopefully, the week off will help Jones and the other banged up Lions.
2-1 after three weeks isn't too bad. In light of their recent history, I'll embrace the winning record in September and hope October provides the Lions with another winning mark.
When the tv went on, it was 27-7 Eagles and about the only positive thing I gleaned was that Philadelphia kicker Jeff Akers was having a good day. He started on my fantasy team this week. The final was a disappointing 30-13 score. I never expected a Super Bowl run from the Detroit football team, but I would have preferred a closer game against a quality opponent.
Of course, there was one other huge good sign for me and the Lions. Roy Williams was having his best day yet. The rookie wide receiver caught nine passes for 135 yards and scored both Lions' touchdowns. I started him on my fantasy team, too. More importantly, the Lions may actually have their first great offensive player since Barry Sanders retired and their best receiver since Herman Moore's glory days.
The game itself was never really that much of a contest, so I don't think I'll dwell on it. Philadelphia is very good and no one should be too surprised the Lions got slapped around. I heard Kevin Jones' was injured, so that will concern all of Lions' Country. They must have him back and healthy. Hopefully, the week off will help Jones and the other banged up Lions.
2-1 after three weeks isn't too bad. In light of their recent history, I'll embrace the winning record in September and hope October provides the Lions with another winning mark.
B.B. Baker's Dozen
There is no movement in my top 13 this week. There were some shaky performances, but not enough to demote anyone a spot. Both Virignia and Purdue are on the edge of being included, but I couldn't find them a spot right now. In all likelihood, one or both will join the party next week. Some big games next weekend will definitely shake up all the polls.
1. Southern Cal- Stanford is their second close call of '04. #9 Cal is on the horizon.
2. Oklahoma- Still number two, but a bit closer with the Trojans struggles.
3. Miami- The D got the job done this past weekend.
4. Georgia- UGA gets LSU on Saturday.
5. Texas- A nice win and Benson is still in the Heisman derby.
6. Ohio State- The Buckeyes hold their spot without playing.
7. Utah- Air Force was very pesky, but the Utes still merit their top 10 ranking.
8. West Viriginia- Mountaineers win, Kay-Jay Harris is out of the Heisman race.
9. California- Bears take on USC Saturday.
10. Fresno State- Bulldogs can't afford to slip up vs. La. Tech this week.
11. Tennessee- Freshmen QBs Ainge and Schaeffer get to host Auburn this week.
12. Auburn- Forget The Citadel game, Tigers travel to Knoxville this week.
13. Louisiana State- Georgia is next.
1. Southern Cal- Stanford is their second close call of '04. #9 Cal is on the horizon.
2. Oklahoma- Still number two, but a bit closer with the Trojans struggles.
3. Miami- The D got the job done this past weekend.
4. Georgia- UGA gets LSU on Saturday.
5. Texas- A nice win and Benson is still in the Heisman derby.
6. Ohio State- The Buckeyes hold their spot without playing.
7. Utah- Air Force was very pesky, but the Utes still merit their top 10 ranking.
8. West Viriginia- Mountaineers win, Kay-Jay Harris is out of the Heisman race.
9. California- Bears take on USC Saturday.
10. Fresno State- Bulldogs can't afford to slip up vs. La. Tech this week.
11. Tennessee- Freshmen QBs Ainge and Schaeffer get to host Auburn this week.
12. Auburn- Forget The Citadel game, Tigers travel to Knoxville this week.
13. Louisiana State- Georgia is next.
Saturday, September 25, 2004
Your Heisman Leader
If I had to vote today, Purdue quarterback Kyle Orton would be my Heisman selection. Another +300 yard, four touchdown game this afternoon. It's becoming the norm for the Boilermakers signal caller. However, since it's only week four and I don't actually get to vote for the Heisman, Orton's going to have to convince quite a few others.
Friday, September 24, 2004
S.I.'s Donovan Tosses One Back At The Fans
I have a new brother-in-arms. Since the infamous chair tossing incident in Oakland a while back, I've been debating how to address my feelings. Now, I don't have to. Sports Illustrated's John Donovan relays my sentiments perfectly (here). Thank you, Mr. Donovan.
Green Sits
Shawn Green of the Los Angeles Dodgers won't play tomorrow. He's going to observe the Jewish holiday, Yom Kippur. There has been some debate over Green's decision, but I can't fault him. Players in all sports miss time for all kinds of reasons nowadays. There are the obvious ones, the birth of children and funerals (which, by the way, few athletes missed games for thirty years ago).
There are also the mysterious "personal reasons" absences. These are rarely discussed, but they range from a fight with the spouse to substance abuse issues to doctor's appointments. Unless these days become repetitive, we rarely comment on them.
If Green wants to sit tomorrow, that's fine. At least he's not AWOL. Or retiring.
There are also the mysterious "personal reasons" absences. These are rarely discussed, but they range from a fight with the spouse to substance abuse issues to doctor's appointments. Unless these days become repetitive, we rarely comment on them.
If Green wants to sit tomorrow, that's fine. At least he's not AWOL. Or retiring.
Bring On The Senators, Already
I have no idea if moving the Montreal/Puerto Rico Expos to Washington is a viable plan or not, but I suspect all baseball fans (and the team's players) are tired of waiting for MLB to figure that out.
Deadlines come and go. Seasons come and go. Yet Bud Selig and the boys still cannot decide if D.C. is the way to go. At this point, Bud, there are two options. 1) Leave the Expos in limbo for another season. 2) Move them to the nation's capital and find out what happens next.
I'm leaning towards the second choice. I know some feel moving the team to Washington, D.C. is a losing proposition right now , perhaps they are right. The question for me is "Will the would-be Senators fanbase financially support a bad baseball team (the Expos) in an old park (RFK) for a decade or more?"
If the answer to that question is yes, move the Expos this instant. If the answer is no, make the Expos play another two years in Quebec and give towns like Portland a chance to build a stadium. Two more years would even give the D.C. backers twenty-four months to get their city council to dig up some money for a new ballpark. (Not that I favor public funding, but that's another post.)
At the start of the 2007 season, the Expos should open in their new, hopefully long-term home. No more muffed deadlines. No more Puerto Rico. No games in three countries. Make a decision one year from now, give the new host one year to plan. End of process.
I'd love to see the Senators return, but I'd be just as happy to have the Expos stabilized. Just make a decision already.
Deadlines come and go. Seasons come and go. Yet Bud Selig and the boys still cannot decide if D.C. is the way to go. At this point, Bud, there are two options. 1) Leave the Expos in limbo for another season. 2) Move them to the nation's capital and find out what happens next.
I'm leaning towards the second choice. I know some feel moving the team to Washington, D.C. is a losing proposition right now , perhaps they are right. The question for me is "Will the would-be Senators fanbase financially support a bad baseball team (the Expos) in an old park (RFK) for a decade or more?"
If the answer to that question is yes, move the Expos this instant. If the answer is no, make the Expos play another two years in Quebec and give towns like Portland a chance to build a stadium. Two more years would even give the D.C. backers twenty-four months to get their city council to dig up some money for a new ballpark. (Not that I favor public funding, but that's another post.)
At the start of the 2007 season, the Expos should open in their new, hopefully long-term home. No more muffed deadlines. No more Puerto Rico. No games in three countries. Make a decision one year from now, give the new host one year to plan. End of process.
I'd love to see the Senators return, but I'd be just as happy to have the Expos stabilized. Just make a decision already.
Thursday, September 23, 2004
'Canes Owner Vents
Carolina Hurricanes' owner Peter Karmanos sounds more than a tad angry in this article by Nicholas Cotosnika of the Detroit Free Press. The Detroit resident went off during media day for the Plymouth Whalers, the team he owns in the Ontario Hockey League. Karmanos offered a number of opinions on the NHL lockout, here are some of my favorites.
First, Karmanos claims that the NHLPA is "way past the point of no return in terms of greed". Let me offer this tiny bit of public relations advice to a man who doesn't need it. In this post-Enron era of corporate greed, not many are going to side with the CEO of a major company (Compuware) who owns both a NHL and OHL franchise. Having someone with that kind of wealth calling others greedy is a tough sell.
Karmanos suggests he lost an average of $12 to $15 million per season since 1994. He claims he will only "lose half as much money by not playing". Again, to be able to afford to lose $12 million a year for a decade, his low figure, doesn't sound like a man hurting for cash. Worse yet, he appears more than willing to eat another $6 to $7.5 million a year to not watch his team play to prove his point. Yet, he maintains that $1.8 million dollar a year salary figure for the players is "ridiculous"?
Of course, you are losing big money Mr. K., you own a hockey team in CAROLINA. Who's bright idea was that? I'm sure there are some dedicated hockey fans in that area, but let's be serious. Hockey in the south was more wishful thinking than solid business strategy. Are you really surprised you are losing boatloads of cash when some Canadian franchises, with tons of tradition and far more interest nationally, are also having economic trouble?
Then comes the most unfortunate statement of the interview. Karmanos, while discussing his NHL losses, mentioned his cancer center. "Where do you think the I'd rather have seen the money go?" Karmanos questioned. I really want to be diplomatic here, as Karmanos has given a great deal to the Karmanos Cancer Institute and he should be applauded for that, but his suggestion irks me.
He is, of course, claiming if the 'Canes could turn a profit he could have put more into his cancer center. He is also claiming, indirectly, of course, that the NHLPA is to blame for this. I have two huge issues with this. First, blaming the NHLPA, even indirectly, for your poor business decisions and for costing the cancer center additional funding is out of line. Way out of line.
Second, if Mr. Karmanos really wanted to pump significantly more revenue into the Institute, unlike the rest of us, I suspect he could write a check this instant. If not, selling the 'Canes, Whalers or a portion of Compuware might create quite a bit of capital. That income could certainly go straight towards charity work, if that's his true desire.
Amongst other things, Karmanos also informs us that a salary is the only answer to the NHL's money problems and that the fans and media force teams into signing players to big contracts lest the owners be charged with not caring.
Unfortunately, all that comes across during this adamant discussion is that Karmanos is mad at everyone else for his team's finances and the problems that have resulted. Is it any wonder why so many believe the NHL lockout will be protracted? If half the owners share Karmanos' bitterness and inability to accept responsibility for the league's state, this lockout will easily last over a year.
First, Karmanos claims that the NHLPA is "way past the point of no return in terms of greed". Let me offer this tiny bit of public relations advice to a man who doesn't need it. In this post-Enron era of corporate greed, not many are going to side with the CEO of a major company (Compuware) who owns both a NHL and OHL franchise. Having someone with that kind of wealth calling others greedy is a tough sell.
Karmanos suggests he lost an average of $12 to $15 million per season since 1994. He claims he will only "lose half as much money by not playing". Again, to be able to afford to lose $12 million a year for a decade, his low figure, doesn't sound like a man hurting for cash. Worse yet, he appears more than willing to eat another $6 to $7.5 million a year to not watch his team play to prove his point. Yet, he maintains that $1.8 million dollar a year salary figure for the players is "ridiculous"?
Of course, you are losing big money Mr. K., you own a hockey team in CAROLINA. Who's bright idea was that? I'm sure there are some dedicated hockey fans in that area, but let's be serious. Hockey in the south was more wishful thinking than solid business strategy. Are you really surprised you are losing boatloads of cash when some Canadian franchises, with tons of tradition and far more interest nationally, are also having economic trouble?
Then comes the most unfortunate statement of the interview. Karmanos, while discussing his NHL losses, mentioned his cancer center. "Where do you think the I'd rather have seen the money go?" Karmanos questioned. I really want to be diplomatic here, as Karmanos has given a great deal to the Karmanos Cancer Institute and he should be applauded for that, but his suggestion irks me.
He is, of course, claiming if the 'Canes could turn a profit he could have put more into his cancer center. He is also claiming, indirectly, of course, that the NHLPA is to blame for this. I have two huge issues with this. First, blaming the NHLPA, even indirectly, for your poor business decisions and for costing the cancer center additional funding is out of line. Way out of line.
Second, if Mr. Karmanos really wanted to pump significantly more revenue into the Institute, unlike the rest of us, I suspect he could write a check this instant. If not, selling the 'Canes, Whalers or a portion of Compuware might create quite a bit of capital. That income could certainly go straight towards charity work, if that's his true desire.
Amongst other things, Karmanos also informs us that a salary is the only answer to the NHL's money problems and that the fans and media force teams into signing players to big contracts lest the owners be charged with not caring.
Unfortunately, all that comes across during this adamant discussion is that Karmanos is mad at everyone else for his team's finances and the problems that have resulted. Is it any wonder why so many believe the NHL lockout will be protracted? If half the owners share Karmanos' bitterness and inability to accept responsibility for the league's state, this lockout will easily last over a year.
Tuesday, September 21, 2004
Twins Make It Three
I don't know if anyone outside the Twin Cities noticed, but Minnesota won it's third straight American League Central division title last night. Not bad for a team that was darn near contracted. I know hindsight is 20/20, but did anyone, other than their sorry owner, really think the Twins should have even been discussed as a contraction candidate?
Lions Diary
Rookie WR Roy Williams gets some ink, or at least some internet space, on ESPN.com here.
Sunday, September 19, 2004
Was This Larry Brown's Team?
As I suggested yesterday, the Ryder Cup has returned to Europe. The Euros not only retained Samuel Ryder's trophy, but pasted the Americans 18.5 to 9.5. Let me make one thing abundantly clear, this was an embarrassment. Losing to a talented European squad is nothing to be ashamed of. Contrary to all of the media that labeled Bernhard Langer's side "no names", this is a good group of internationally tested golfers. (In all honesty, I doubt even 50% of the media covering this Ryder Cup have a clue about the European Tour or the players on it.) They weren't the finest team the Europeans have ever assembled, but they were much better than the average person (or media member) recognized.
However, losing in such an overwhelming style on U.S. soil is a bit disgraceful. Now, I say "a bit" in part because I can keep sport in its proper perspective. This isn't a tragedy. It's just golf. In strictly golf terms, though, this was disgraceful because of the size of the defeat and because we all know that this isn't all that important to most of the top U.S. golfers.
I suspect Phil, Tiger and D.L. III would like to win the Ryder Cup, I just don't think they fret much over losing it. Woods, himself, stated that no one knows Jack Nicklaus' Ryder Cup record, only that he holds 18 major championships. Suddenly, I had flashbacks to USA Basketball. That group would have liked an Olympic gold medal, but they never grew up dreaming of one. They cared about NBA Championships, scoring titles and endorsement deals. This collection of U.S. PGA Tour stars only cares about tournament wins (majors, especially), money titles and endorsement deals. Notice a pattern here?
What neither group grasps is that if you want to be top dog, you need to win everything. The reason Nicklaus' Ryder Cup record seldom is discussed is two fold. First, the Ryder Cup wasn't as big back then. Second, Jack's side won. A lot. Winning and pushing the Ryder Cup forward by encouraging the inclusion of all of Europe into the format made Nicklaus legendary. Winning two Olympic golds only solidified the greatness of Michael Jordan. Winning one of them with Larry Bird and Magic Johnson as teammates only elevated the status of all three. It's something Tiger, Lefty and D.L. III could learn from.
I know I put much of the burden of defeat on Hal Sutton's shoulders and I stick by that, but a few points in Sutton's defense. Team play is hard. Just ask Larry Brown. It's particularly hard for the favorites. Again, ask coach Brown. It's also difficult when you have to juggle superstar egos. Yes, Brown knows a thing or two about that.
Like the U.S. Olympic basketball coach, Sutton, too, has his own large ego to lug around. Both men exhibited their egos through their inflexibility. Sutton by stubbornly attempting to force team chemistry by pairing Woods and Mickelson together. Brown by ignoring the international style of play and refusing to play to his team's strengths. Both pointed fingers at those they led. Neither came off looking very well and neither won.
I suppose both could claim they were slightly handcuffed by not being able to pick their entire squad, but both had more than enough talent to finish in first place. Sutton had far more talent than Brown did, but the golfers never really play a team concept, so that offset some of that advantage.
The United States has two years to regroup. A new captain will be picked shortly. He's not a man many will envy. He will have the weight of this crushing defeat on his shoulders and will face the Euros on their home turf. Hopefully, a more mature and hungry group of U.S. golfers will emerge from this mess.
However, losing in such an overwhelming style on U.S. soil is a bit disgraceful. Now, I say "a bit" in part because I can keep sport in its proper perspective. This isn't a tragedy. It's just golf. In strictly golf terms, though, this was disgraceful because of the size of the defeat and because we all know that this isn't all that important to most of the top U.S. golfers.
I suspect Phil, Tiger and D.L. III would like to win the Ryder Cup, I just don't think they fret much over losing it. Woods, himself, stated that no one knows Jack Nicklaus' Ryder Cup record, only that he holds 18 major championships. Suddenly, I had flashbacks to USA Basketball. That group would have liked an Olympic gold medal, but they never grew up dreaming of one. They cared about NBA Championships, scoring titles and endorsement deals. This collection of U.S. PGA Tour stars only cares about tournament wins (majors, especially), money titles and endorsement deals. Notice a pattern here?
What neither group grasps is that if you want to be top dog, you need to win everything. The reason Nicklaus' Ryder Cup record seldom is discussed is two fold. First, the Ryder Cup wasn't as big back then. Second, Jack's side won. A lot. Winning and pushing the Ryder Cup forward by encouraging the inclusion of all of Europe into the format made Nicklaus legendary. Winning two Olympic golds only solidified the greatness of Michael Jordan. Winning one of them with Larry Bird and Magic Johnson as teammates only elevated the status of all three. It's something Tiger, Lefty and D.L. III could learn from.
I know I put much of the burden of defeat on Hal Sutton's shoulders and I stick by that, but a few points in Sutton's defense. Team play is hard. Just ask Larry Brown. It's particularly hard for the favorites. Again, ask coach Brown. It's also difficult when you have to juggle superstar egos. Yes, Brown knows a thing or two about that.
Like the U.S. Olympic basketball coach, Sutton, too, has his own large ego to lug around. Both men exhibited their egos through their inflexibility. Sutton by stubbornly attempting to force team chemistry by pairing Woods and Mickelson together. Brown by ignoring the international style of play and refusing to play to his team's strengths. Both pointed fingers at those they led. Neither came off looking very well and neither won.
I suppose both could claim they were slightly handcuffed by not being able to pick their entire squad, but both had more than enough talent to finish in first place. Sutton had far more talent than Brown did, but the golfers never really play a team concept, so that offset some of that advantage.
The United States has two years to regroup. A new captain will be picked shortly. He's not a man many will envy. He will have the weight of this crushing defeat on his shoulders and will face the Euros on their home turf. Hopefully, a more mature and hungry group of U.S. golfers will emerge from this mess.
Lions Diary
2-0. The Lions are undefeated after beating the Houston Texans 28-16. It wasn't an epic battle, it was just a nice win at home. It also moved the Lions to the top of the division. (Yeah, yeah, Minnesota can tie them with a win tomorrow. Don't be so technical. Let me enjoy the moment.)
I have to be pleased with Roy Williams who caught two touchdowns today (too bad I didn't start him in my fantasy league). He looks like a potential star after the first two weeks of the season. There seems to be little Williams cannot do. I wasn't much of a Williams fan in college, but his performance thus far has changed my mind. I hope he can maintain this level of play.
DT Shaun Rogers is heading straight for Hawaii. He is a dominant inside force. Joey Harrington didn't post spectacular numbers, but was steady and avoided big mistakes. I'll take a 3 to 1 TD/INT ratio anyday.
The concern has to be the defense that today allowed over 300 yards to Houston. I doubt the Lions can allow playoff caliber teams that type of output and still gain a victory. DE James Hall was offsides about four times. Again, that type of play will not earn you a win over a good team.
Next week, that good team arrives. Philadelphia pays Detroit a visit in Week Three. I suspect more than a few Lions fans will be watching tomorrow night's game between the Eagles and Minnesota to get a good look at next week's opponent.
I'll worry about the Eagles in a couple of days. After having so many bad starts, I'm going to enjoy this 2-0 beginning for a while longer.
I have to be pleased with Roy Williams who caught two touchdowns today (too bad I didn't start him in my fantasy league). He looks like a potential star after the first two weeks of the season. There seems to be little Williams cannot do. I wasn't much of a Williams fan in college, but his performance thus far has changed my mind. I hope he can maintain this level of play.
DT Shaun Rogers is heading straight for Hawaii. He is a dominant inside force. Joey Harrington didn't post spectacular numbers, but was steady and avoided big mistakes. I'll take a 3 to 1 TD/INT ratio anyday.
The concern has to be the defense that today allowed over 300 yards to Houston. I doubt the Lions can allow playoff caliber teams that type of output and still gain a victory. DE James Hall was offsides about four times. Again, that type of play will not earn you a win over a good team.
Next week, that good team arrives. Philadelphia pays Detroit a visit in Week Three. I suspect more than a few Lions fans will be watching tomorrow night's game between the Eagles and Minnesota to get a good look at next week's opponent.
I'll worry about the Eagles in a couple of days. After having so many bad starts, I'm going to enjoy this 2-0 beginning for a while longer.
B.B. Baker's Dozen
This week's topsy-turvy SEC battles altered my top 13. The top two remain the same, as Southern Cal and Oklahoma look strong, but everyone else is on the move.
1. Southern Cal- Did what #1 teams are supposed to do: Win.
2. Oklahoma- How many more weeks before frosh RB Adrian Peterson gets Heisman mention?
3. Miami- I can't believe I have them this high with Brock Berlin at QB.
4. Georgia- Yes, the Dawgs won, but fell a spot. They just haven't been impressive.
5. Texas- The 'Horns move up without playing.
6. Ohio State- I like Zwick more and more each week.
7. Utah- The potential BCS spoilers.
8. West Viriginia- Is beating Maryland really that big a deal?
9. Cal- Another team that moved up by sitting out this past Saturday.
10. Fresno State- It was a bit scary, but FSU did win again.
11. Tennessee- Part of the SEC turmoil. A close win at home vs. the Gators.
12. Auburn- More of the SEC upheavel. I had to put them above LSU.
13. LSU- That one point loss to Auburn is going to hurt for quite a while.
1. Southern Cal- Did what #1 teams are supposed to do: Win.
2. Oklahoma- How many more weeks before frosh RB Adrian Peterson gets Heisman mention?
3. Miami- I can't believe I have them this high with Brock Berlin at QB.
4. Georgia- Yes, the Dawgs won, but fell a spot. They just haven't been impressive.
5. Texas- The 'Horns move up without playing.
6. Ohio State- I like Zwick more and more each week.
7. Utah- The potential BCS spoilers.
8. West Viriginia- Is beating Maryland really that big a deal?
9. Cal- Another team that moved up by sitting out this past Saturday.
10. Fresno State- It was a bit scary, but FSU did win again.
11. Tennessee- Part of the SEC turmoil. A close win at home vs. the Gators.
12. Auburn- More of the SEC upheavel. I had to put them above LSU.
13. LSU- That one point loss to Auburn is going to hurt for quite a while.
Saturday, September 18, 2004
Bye, Bye Ryder Cup
Technically, it's not over yet. The Americans could post the most remarkable comeback in golf history and capture the Ryder Cup, but let's be honest. That isn't going to happen. Not only would a number of U.S. players have to rise to occasion, something very few of them have done the last two days, but the Europeans would have to choke in epic proportion. That's something they haven't done much of yet, either.
The pundits have already begun to analyze and criticize the situation. Much like USA Basketball's Olympic collapse, their is plenty of blame to toss around, but this thing was lost in the first pairing Friday morning.
Captain Hal Sutton probably cost his squad their best chance of winning by pairing Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson together. As nearly everyone on Earth knows, the top two players in the U.S. don't like each other. However, Sutton handled the pairing the way he's handled the rest of his captaincy, he shoved it down our throats.
Now, there is a time when the captain is expected to make a golfer do something he would prefer not to. I would think that would be on Saturday, especially if your team is behind. It's not first thing Friday morning. That type of "I don't give a crap about who you like" speech is probably best reserved for a dramatic moment. By pairing his team's biggest antagonists together first thing Friday morning, Sutton made Friday the dramatic moment.
Running the same pairing out for the afternoon was just plain suicide in retrospect. Sutton helped the Euros by taking all the pressure off them, not that they faced much to begin with, and put all of it on Woods, Mickelson and himself. Arguably the most pressured filled golf most of these men will ever face, was minimized as even casual fans wondered and watched to see if Tiger and Phil would play nice together.
Sure, neither threw a punch at the other, but neither enjoyed the day and their play revealed that. If you don't believe that, look at how much better both played Saturday. Paired with friend Chris Riley, Woods won. He even looked excited. Mickelson, after his Saturday morning benching, looked much better, too. He and partner David Toms won 4 and 3. The U.S. still lost Saturday, 4.5 to 3.5, but you have to wonder if the score on Friday might have been as close if Tiger and Phil had spent more time apart on the opening day?
Since Day 1 of his captaincy, Sutton has appeared to have two agendas. I have to believe the first was to win, but it's the second that seemed to be his pre-occupation. Sutton appeared driven to prove to someone, anyone that the U.S. was a "team" just like the Euros are perceived to be. They were every bit as close as the Europeans, dang it, as he would show us by putting Tiger and Phil together.
Sutton also acted as if any old pairing would turn out just fine. He played all of his players, including his rookies Friday, while European captain Bernhard Langer let his rookies sit on the first day. He skipped the previously successful Mickelson/Toms coupling and ignored the Woods/Riley friendship.
Then, Sutton let Riley excuse himself on Saturday afternoon when he should have offered up his "I don't give a hoot what you want" speech and made Riley play with Woods again. Woods needed Riley's friendship and Sutton needed a motivated, happy Woods. Sutton should have convinced Riley he was just going along for the ride, it was Tiger's job to do the work. Captain Hal refused to let go of the unsuccessful pairing of Tiger and Lefty Friday afternoon, but wouldn't force Riley to compete with Woods after they were successful Saturday morning. It's hard to explain.
I have to give Detroit Free Press golf writer Carlos Monarrez some props here. Monarrez suggested last month that Sutton would be the one to cost the United States the Ryder Cup. His analysis was, and still is, much more detailed than mine. He hammers Sutton harder than I do, but looking at the largest deficit in Ryder Cup history tonight, it's difficult to argue with his observations.
To be completely fair to Hal Sutton, there is plenty of blame to go around. Woods if often criticized for not caring about the Ryder Cup, something he almost admitted as much to this week, but Mickelson's recent club change also doesn't sound like a man too concerned about his upcoming performance. Riley's begging out of Saturday's afternoon pairings will not settle well with some, either.
In the end, it all came down to the beginning. When Friday concluded, after Woods and Mickelson spent their day look for their wild tee shots in the rough and losing matches, the United States faced the worst first day deficit in Ryder Cup history. It's a margin that now requires the greatest comeback in Ryder Cup history. It's seems unlikely. Kind of like the odds of Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson getting along.
The pundits have already begun to analyze and criticize the situation. Much like USA Basketball's Olympic collapse, their is plenty of blame to toss around, but this thing was lost in the first pairing Friday morning.
Captain Hal Sutton probably cost his squad their best chance of winning by pairing Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson together. As nearly everyone on Earth knows, the top two players in the U.S. don't like each other. However, Sutton handled the pairing the way he's handled the rest of his captaincy, he shoved it down our throats.
Now, there is a time when the captain is expected to make a golfer do something he would prefer not to. I would think that would be on Saturday, especially if your team is behind. It's not first thing Friday morning. That type of "I don't give a crap about who you like" speech is probably best reserved for a dramatic moment. By pairing his team's biggest antagonists together first thing Friday morning, Sutton made Friday the dramatic moment.
Running the same pairing out for the afternoon was just plain suicide in retrospect. Sutton helped the Euros by taking all the pressure off them, not that they faced much to begin with, and put all of it on Woods, Mickelson and himself. Arguably the most pressured filled golf most of these men will ever face, was minimized as even casual fans wondered and watched to see if Tiger and Phil would play nice together.
Sure, neither threw a punch at the other, but neither enjoyed the day and their play revealed that. If you don't believe that, look at how much better both played Saturday. Paired with friend Chris Riley, Woods won. He even looked excited. Mickelson, after his Saturday morning benching, looked much better, too. He and partner David Toms won 4 and 3. The U.S. still lost Saturday, 4.5 to 3.5, but you have to wonder if the score on Friday might have been as close if Tiger and Phil had spent more time apart on the opening day?
Since Day 1 of his captaincy, Sutton has appeared to have two agendas. I have to believe the first was to win, but it's the second that seemed to be his pre-occupation. Sutton appeared driven to prove to someone, anyone that the U.S. was a "team" just like the Euros are perceived to be. They were every bit as close as the Europeans, dang it, as he would show us by putting Tiger and Phil together.
Sutton also acted as if any old pairing would turn out just fine. He played all of his players, including his rookies Friday, while European captain Bernhard Langer let his rookies sit on the first day. He skipped the previously successful Mickelson/Toms coupling and ignored the Woods/Riley friendship.
Then, Sutton let Riley excuse himself on Saturday afternoon when he should have offered up his "I don't give a hoot what you want" speech and made Riley play with Woods again. Woods needed Riley's friendship and Sutton needed a motivated, happy Woods. Sutton should have convinced Riley he was just going along for the ride, it was Tiger's job to do the work. Captain Hal refused to let go of the unsuccessful pairing of Tiger and Lefty Friday afternoon, but wouldn't force Riley to compete with Woods after they were successful Saturday morning. It's hard to explain.
I have to give Detroit Free Press golf writer Carlos Monarrez some props here. Monarrez suggested last month that Sutton would be the one to cost the United States the Ryder Cup. His analysis was, and still is, much more detailed than mine. He hammers Sutton harder than I do, but looking at the largest deficit in Ryder Cup history tonight, it's difficult to argue with his observations.
To be completely fair to Hal Sutton, there is plenty of blame to go around. Woods if often criticized for not caring about the Ryder Cup, something he almost admitted as much to this week, but Mickelson's recent club change also doesn't sound like a man too concerned about his upcoming performance. Riley's begging out of Saturday's afternoon pairings will not settle well with some, either.
In the end, it all came down to the beginning. When Friday concluded, after Woods and Mickelson spent their day look for their wild tee shots in the rough and losing matches, the United States faced the worst first day deficit in Ryder Cup history. It's a margin that now requires the greatest comeback in Ryder Cup history. It's seems unlikely. Kind of like the odds of Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson getting along.
Tuesday, September 14, 2004
The End of Hockey
When the World Cup wraps up tonight, hockey ends. The owners, barring some unforeseen miracle, will lock the players out of camp at midnight. I'm not even going to pretend to understand the whole mess, but I think the owners may hold most of the cards here. Why? Because many of us still over-estimate hockey's popularity.
In North America, we think of the Big Four team sports. The NFL, MLB, NBA and the NHL. Yet, there is almost nothing that indicates the NHL deserves that honor. A quick look some television ratings tell us all we need to know. The World Cup semi-finals drew a horrible .4 rating. The World Series of Poker got a 1.7 mark. Poker. That's men playing cards on television. People make fun of bowling and curling on tv. Please. Is poker any better?
However, poker is perceived as more exciting than an international hockey tournament. A lot more exciting if we judge strictly by tv ratings. That's simply awful.
Then, there's tennis. You remember tennis, right? It was kind of popular about twenty or thirty years ago. Connors, Borg, McEnroe, et al. Well, the just concluded U.S. Open drew a 2.5 rating. That almost double poker's viewership. Tennis, now considered a fringe sport by many, drew 2.1 more ratings points than hockey. Is there really any need to look at NASCAR or PGA Tour ratings? Didn't think so.
This is why I think the owners hold most of the cards. They can wait. They can close down a franchise, thus costing the NHLPA jobs. They can lose money, as you have to think based on tv ratings, a number of them probably are already. What's a couple of months more of losses with the possibility of salary limits on the horizon? Fans? Sure they will be upset, but there are so few of them, the backlash will be severe, but small. Besides, they are diehards. When the game returns, so will they.
There's only about three hours left before the doors around the NHL get locked. I guess I better get back in front of my tv before the World Cup is over. This may be the last pro hockey we see until sometime in 2005.
In North America, we think of the Big Four team sports. The NFL, MLB, NBA and the NHL. Yet, there is almost nothing that indicates the NHL deserves that honor. A quick look some television ratings tell us all we need to know. The World Cup semi-finals drew a horrible .4 rating. The World Series of Poker got a 1.7 mark. Poker. That's men playing cards on television. People make fun of bowling and curling on tv. Please. Is poker any better?
However, poker is perceived as more exciting than an international hockey tournament. A lot more exciting if we judge strictly by tv ratings. That's simply awful.
Then, there's tennis. You remember tennis, right? It was kind of popular about twenty or thirty years ago. Connors, Borg, McEnroe, et al. Well, the just concluded U.S. Open drew a 2.5 rating. That almost double poker's viewership. Tennis, now considered a fringe sport by many, drew 2.1 more ratings points than hockey. Is there really any need to look at NASCAR or PGA Tour ratings? Didn't think so.
This is why I think the owners hold most of the cards. They can wait. They can close down a franchise, thus costing the NHLPA jobs. They can lose money, as you have to think based on tv ratings, a number of them probably are already. What's a couple of months more of losses with the possibility of salary limits on the horizon? Fans? Sure they will be upset, but there are so few of them, the backlash will be severe, but small. Besides, they are diehards. When the game returns, so will they.
There's only about three hours left before the doors around the NHL get locked. I guess I better get back in front of my tv before the World Cup is over. This may be the last pro hockey we see until sometime in 2005.
Lions Diary
The Lions are getting some love around the country aftering dispatching that 24 game road losing streak. ESPN.com's power ratings have the Honolulu Blue and Silver coming in at number twenty-two. It isn't like being in the top five, but it ain't the basement, either.
Mike Wilbon also gave Mooch and company some respect on PTI tonight. He mentioned how they are a good, young team and he feels they can get to nine wins. Wilbon said they might even make the playoffs. It's nice to hear some good things about your football team for a change.
Mike Wilbon also gave Mooch and company some respect on PTI tonight. He mentioned how they are a good, young team and he feels they can get to nine wins. Wilbon said they might even make the playoffs. It's nice to hear some good things about your football team for a change.
Monday, September 13, 2004
No Kidding
I read Peter Gammons EPSN.com piece about the "Moneyball" general managers who have turned their eyes and calculators over to defense. Seems after years of studying offensive production, the stat boys are looking for ways to measure defense in baseball. Range factors, zone ratings and some double secret stats that none of the wonder boys are yet willing to share are all the rage.
Using these new concepts in evaluating defense, the stat geeks agreed that Mike Cameron and Mark Kotsay are really good defensively. That left me thinking one thing. No kidding. Welcome to the party, fellas.
Forgive me of my sarcasm, but I needed absolutely zero numbers to realize that Cameron and Kotsay were good defensively. I also have a tough time believing Billy Beane, Theo Epstein and the other uber-stat GMs didn't know that long before they glanced at each player's zone ratings. That's where the stat crowd loses me.
While I feel today's statistical numbers are enlightening and interesting, I'm concerned about over-analysis. A variety of managers, scouts, players and fans have all claimed stats are not the whole story, but the number crunchers just hate that notion. Everything in their world needs some type of mathematical validation.
Yeah, I suppose that the stats will reveal a player or two that aren't as bad, or good, as we think, but isn't the majority of this stuff kind of obvious? Does anyone who follows baseball not realize that Doug Mientkiewicz owns one of best gloves in all of the game?
I remember the year after Ryne Sandberg retired, the first time. Chicago could not turn a double play. They did all the time the year prior, with the steady should-be Hall of Famer at second. One year later, they struggled to turn DPs. No Cubs fan needed stats to realize what the difference was.
Oh, and what happened to the theory the stat guys offered about "Forget defense, if the guy can hit. He will drive in more runs than he gives up"? Apparently, Theo Epstein has tossed that one aside after watching his Red Sox give away runs for half a season. (I'll spot you that Nomar Garciaparra's impending free agency was a huge factor in making the deal, but even as a big Nomar fan, I think the Red Sox are more solid defensively with Mientkiewicz, Orlando Cabrera and Dave Roberts playing the field.)
I encourage the stat gurus to continue to turn out as many new numbers as they can. Again, I find it educational. (Beane wasn't the only one who loved Nick Swisher's bat in college.) If you are just trying to back up your theories or are looking for every possible edge, that's fine by me. Let's just try and be respectful of each other's opinion. Because every once in a while, if it looks like a duck...............
Using these new concepts in evaluating defense, the stat geeks agreed that Mike Cameron and Mark Kotsay are really good defensively. That left me thinking one thing. No kidding. Welcome to the party, fellas.
Forgive me of my sarcasm, but I needed absolutely zero numbers to realize that Cameron and Kotsay were good defensively. I also have a tough time believing Billy Beane, Theo Epstein and the other uber-stat GMs didn't know that long before they glanced at each player's zone ratings. That's where the stat crowd loses me.
While I feel today's statistical numbers are enlightening and interesting, I'm concerned about over-analysis. A variety of managers, scouts, players and fans have all claimed stats are not the whole story, but the number crunchers just hate that notion. Everything in their world needs some type of mathematical validation.
Yeah, I suppose that the stats will reveal a player or two that aren't as bad, or good, as we think, but isn't the majority of this stuff kind of obvious? Does anyone who follows baseball not realize that Doug Mientkiewicz owns one of best gloves in all of the game?
I remember the year after Ryne Sandberg retired, the first time. Chicago could not turn a double play. They did all the time the year prior, with the steady should-be Hall of Famer at second. One year later, they struggled to turn DPs. No Cubs fan needed stats to realize what the difference was.
Oh, and what happened to the theory the stat guys offered about "Forget defense, if the guy can hit. He will drive in more runs than he gives up"? Apparently, Theo Epstein has tossed that one aside after watching his Red Sox give away runs for half a season. (I'll spot you that Nomar Garciaparra's impending free agency was a huge factor in making the deal, but even as a big Nomar fan, I think the Red Sox are more solid defensively with Mientkiewicz, Orlando Cabrera and Dave Roberts playing the field.)
I encourage the stat gurus to continue to turn out as many new numbers as they can. Again, I find it educational. (Beane wasn't the only one who loved Nick Swisher's bat in college.) If you are just trying to back up your theories or are looking for every possible edge, that's fine by me. Let's just try and be respectful of each other's opinion. Because every once in a while, if it looks like a duck...............
Lions Diary
It's over. Thankfully. The Detroit Lions' NFL record road losing streak came to an end on Sunday. The Chicago Bears were kind enough to help the Lions out of their misery, losing to the Honolulu Blue and Silver 20-16. It certainly wasn't a pretty win, but I'll take it. If your team hadn't won a road game since 2000, you would gladly take it, too.
Like any other contest, this game had it's good and bad points for the Lions. On a positive note, I liked Roy Williams' performance. Kevin Jones showed flashes. I'm a Teddy Lehman fan and thought he played pretty will in his first NFL game. Shaun Rogers is headed to the Pro Bowl, if he can stay healthy.
Health really was the big problem Sunday. Pro Bowler Dre Bly is out for a couple of weeks minimum and Charles Rogers is gone for the season. Rogers broke his collarbone for the second straight year. His loss is a huge disappointment. The Lions' medical staff seemed to be helping players around all afternoon.
I'll worry about the injuries closer to game time Sunday. Now, it's time to enjoy the end of this miserable streak.
Like any other contest, this game had it's good and bad points for the Lions. On a positive note, I liked Roy Williams' performance. Kevin Jones showed flashes. I'm a Teddy Lehman fan and thought he played pretty will in his first NFL game. Shaun Rogers is headed to the Pro Bowl, if he can stay healthy.
Health really was the big problem Sunday. Pro Bowler Dre Bly is out for a couple of weeks minimum and Charles Rogers is gone for the season. Rogers broke his collarbone for the second straight year. His loss is a huge disappointment. The Lions' medical staff seemed to be helping players around all afternoon.
I'll worry about the injuries closer to game time Sunday. Now, it's time to enjoy the end of this miserable streak.
B.B. Baker's Dozen
Southern Cal maintains it's top spot in this week's Baker's Dozen. However, there are a few new entries rounding out Beyond Boxscores' top 13 teams.
1. Southern Cal- Couldn't find a reason to drop Leinhart and company.
2. Oklahoma- Offense on cruise control.
3. LSU- A better performance in Week Two.
4. Georgia- Not looking like national champ contenders yet.
5. Miami- Berlin will need to improve if they hope to maintain this spot.
6. Texas- Little matters pre-Sooners game.
7. Ohio State- Another close win for the Buckeyes.
8. Utah- Second best team in the west.
9. Florida- Battle Tennessee this week.
10. West Virginia- Can ease into January 1 bowl game.
11. Iowa- Close call vs. ISU.
12. Cal- Arrington should get Heisman consideration.
13. Fresno State- Embarassed K-State in Wildcats' house.
I wanted to keep both Michigan and Florida State in the top 13, losing to traditional rivals, but could convince myself to do so. Both have plenty of get back into my rankings. Tennessee will be in the mix next week, if they can drop Florida.
1. Southern Cal- Couldn't find a reason to drop Leinhart and company.
2. Oklahoma- Offense on cruise control.
3. LSU- A better performance in Week Two.
4. Georgia- Not looking like national champ contenders yet.
5. Miami- Berlin will need to improve if they hope to maintain this spot.
6. Texas- Little matters pre-Sooners game.
7. Ohio State- Another close win for the Buckeyes.
8. Utah- Second best team in the west.
9. Florida- Battle Tennessee this week.
10. West Virginia- Can ease into January 1 bowl game.
11. Iowa- Close call vs. ISU.
12. Cal- Arrington should get Heisman consideration.
13. Fresno State- Embarassed K-State in Wildcats' house.
I wanted to keep both Michigan and Florida State in the top 13, losing to traditional rivals, but could convince myself to do so. Both have plenty of get back into my rankings. Tennessee will be in the mix next week, if they can drop Florida.
Saturday, September 11, 2004
The Premier Pre-Game Show
The best pre-game show in all of sports is ESPN's College Gameday. It's better than many of the games the network broadcasts and far better than any other sport's pre-game fare. The only show that even comes close is CBC's Hockey Night in Canada pre-game.
Chris Fowler, Kirk Herbstreit and Lee Corso remain the heart of the program and create a nice blend of entertainment and information. The producers and directors also deserve credit for maintaining the program's high quality, as well. It's amazing how fast their hour and a half can go by. Is there any better compliment than that?
Chris Fowler, Kirk Herbstreit and Lee Corso remain the heart of the program and create a nice blend of entertainment and information. The producers and directors also deserve credit for maintaining the program's high quality, as well. It's amazing how fast their hour and a half can go by. Is there any better compliment than that?
The Next Netminders
As the World Cup of Hockey '04 winds down, I noticed the future on display. The U.S. got a fine performance out of Robert Esche in this tournament, but the future of USA Hockey rides on the shoulders of Rick DiPietro. While Canada rides Martin Broduer yet again, as they should, their future lies squarely in the hands of Roberto Luongo. It should be fun watching these two young goalies battling over Olympic, World Cup and Canada Cup titles for years to come. Assuming, of course, the NHLPA ever goes back to work.
Where's Dickie V. When You Need Him?
In August, the Minnesota Twins traded minor league outfielder B.J. Garbe. In return, the Twins got veteran catcher Pat Borders from Seattle. This was a minor transaction in every sense of the word. Garbe, a first round Twins draft pick in 1999, seems to have little chance to making The Show. Five years after turning pro, Garbe is hitting a less than dazzling .201 in AA.
As for Borders, to be honest, I thought he retired years ago. He's got to be about forty years old. I can't quite see how this helps the Twins playoff chances, but I'm not that familiar with the Twinkies roster situation. Maybe they view him as a potential minor league instructor/manager someday? Regardless, this deal hardly sent tremors through the baseball world.
So, why did this transaction catch my eye? Well, Garbe was a highly recruited high school superstar. He had decided to attend Stanford, a college baseball powerhouse. Then came the draft and the cash. Garbe opted for the money and Stanford was left without it's prize recruit. However, unlike in college basketball where Dick Vitale or Billy Packer lament these type of things, no one pitched a fit or cried on national television about the state of college baseball or the plight of the athlete. No, things moved on without Garbe in Palo Alto.
In fact, before this year, the Cardinal had played in the last four College World Series. In theory, had Garbe gone to college, he would have been in the CWS each of his four years at Stanford. Instead, the former high school All-America now appears stuck in AA ball. It's the kind of situation that makes Vitale and Packer cringe and we all find a bit disheartening.
Maybe Garbe made the right choice for him. I don't know. I do know that kids make decisions like this all the time and their situations elude the spotlight. There is no Vitale or Packer to cry for them. To offer some balance, I thought I would turn my little flashlight on one such case.
As for Borders, to be honest, I thought he retired years ago. He's got to be about forty years old. I can't quite see how this helps the Twins playoff chances, but I'm not that familiar with the Twinkies roster situation. Maybe they view him as a potential minor league instructor/manager someday? Regardless, this deal hardly sent tremors through the baseball world.
So, why did this transaction catch my eye? Well, Garbe was a highly recruited high school superstar. He had decided to attend Stanford, a college baseball powerhouse. Then came the draft and the cash. Garbe opted for the money and Stanford was left without it's prize recruit. However, unlike in college basketball where Dick Vitale or Billy Packer lament these type of things, no one pitched a fit or cried on national television about the state of college baseball or the plight of the athlete. No, things moved on without Garbe in Palo Alto.
In fact, before this year, the Cardinal had played in the last four College World Series. In theory, had Garbe gone to college, he would have been in the CWS each of his four years at Stanford. Instead, the former high school All-America now appears stuck in AA ball. It's the kind of situation that makes Vitale and Packer cringe and we all find a bit disheartening.
Maybe Garbe made the right choice for him. I don't know. I do know that kids make decisions like this all the time and their situations elude the spotlight. There is no Vitale or Packer to cry for them. To offer some balance, I thought I would turn my little flashlight on one such case.
Friday, September 10, 2004
Weather Or Not
Wednesday night I attended a prolonged rain delay courtesy of the remnants of Hurricane Frances. I had hoped to watch a baseball game, but instead I got to see a glimpse of a tropical depression. This would not have bothered me quite as much if even one local or national weather agency suggested a steady three hours or so of rainfall before the game.
Having tickets to this contest, I had some additional interest in the weather that evening. I checked all the national and local forecasts. 99% of them suggested nothing more than a partly cloudy evening. This was as late as an hour before the game. Now, having learned from previous experience, I kept looking at the national radar only to see this massive rain system heading right for Detroit. However, I was re-assured all day, rain was not coming.
The closest thing I got to an admission of an oncoming tropical depression, was a forecaster that hinted indeed some rain might pop up, here and there, but nothing too bad. In his defense, the rain wasn't horrible. It was just wonderfully consistent. It started about six thirty and ended, well, I don't know when it ended. I left the would-be seven o'clock game after two and a half hours.
What gets me is that didn't everyone see this rather significant storm heading our way since, oh, I don't know, a week ago? It's not like I live in Florida and you just can't tell where the sucker is going to land. I'm in Michigan. It's five days later. It's been inland for almost a week.
It's not like this is some rain pattern that quickly developed out of nowhere. It's a stinking hurricane. They've been tracking it since it was in the Atlantic Ocean. Yet, these morons can't even tell me where it's going to rain a week later? Remember, these are weather experts. (If you want to be really scared, think of these "experts" as cousins to scientists.)
If they can't accurately predict an oncoming tropical storm, maybe it's time to stop guessing. Just leave a continuous radar screen on the television. Let us reach our own conclusions.
Having tickets to this contest, I had some additional interest in the weather that evening. I checked all the national and local forecasts. 99% of them suggested nothing more than a partly cloudy evening. This was as late as an hour before the game. Now, having learned from previous experience, I kept looking at the national radar only to see this massive rain system heading right for Detroit. However, I was re-assured all day, rain was not coming.
The closest thing I got to an admission of an oncoming tropical depression, was a forecaster that hinted indeed some rain might pop up, here and there, but nothing too bad. In his defense, the rain wasn't horrible. It was just wonderfully consistent. It started about six thirty and ended, well, I don't know when it ended. I left the would-be seven o'clock game after two and a half hours.
What gets me is that didn't everyone see this rather significant storm heading our way since, oh, I don't know, a week ago? It's not like I live in Florida and you just can't tell where the sucker is going to land. I'm in Michigan. It's five days later. It's been inland for almost a week.
It's not like this is some rain pattern that quickly developed out of nowhere. It's a stinking hurricane. They've been tracking it since it was in the Atlantic Ocean. Yet, these morons can't even tell me where it's going to rain a week later? Remember, these are weather experts. (If you want to be really scared, think of these "experts" as cousins to scientists.)
If they can't accurately predict an oncoming tropical storm, maybe it's time to stop guessing. Just leave a continuous radar screen on the television. Let us reach our own conclusions.
Lionstown
Detroit is the home to the defending NBA Champion Pistons. It also is home to a charter member of the American League, the Tigers. The success of its hockey team, combined with a brilliant marketing idea, has many referring to the Motor City as Hockeytown. Truth be told, however, Detroit's love is the Lions.
If the Wings or Pistons won one playoff game, or even one playoff series, in the last forty years, they would not sell 50,000 tickets to a regular season game. The Tigers have had trouble getting 10,000 a game in recent years amidst a decade long decline. The Lions? They win one post-season contest in four decades and still could sell out the old 70,000 seat Pontiac Silverdome with some regularity.
Unlike the Pistons, Wings and Tigers who have all won World Championships in the last twenty years, the Lions last title came in 1957. Yet, they are the team most Detroiters love the most. Yeah, pro football is king nationwide (Los Angeles notwithstanding), but there is some special about Detroit's relationship to it's NFL franchise.
I'm beginning to think the Lions have become Detroit's version of the Chicago Cubs. Lovable losers. Often mediocre, at best. A team that rarely makes the playoffs and usually exits quickly once they arrive. Fans go because their fathers and grandfathers have. It's tradition as much as anything.
The team's failure will certainly spring criticism, even unimaginable frustration, but it won't turn the fans away. They return with new found hope come that first kickoff. I'm as guilty as anyone else. I adore baseball. Everyone who knows me acknowledges this. However, the Lions are probably my favorite local team. I don't know why, either. Maybe those ten years of sharing season tickets won me over.
It wasn't the drunken fights at the Silverdome. It wasn't walking over that stinking bridge between parking lots over M-59 in December. It wasn't the consistent ticket price increases. It sure wasn't the team's success, either. Just like the other mindless followers of this franchise, I love draft day (the Lions version of the Super Bowl) and hope they improve each season.
This year's opener comes Sunday in Chicago. The town is abuzz about the potential of newcomers Kevin Jones and Roy Williams. Added to previous first round choices Joey Harrington and Charles Rogers and the Lions faithful believe their might even be an offensive attack in Honolulu Blue and Silver this year.
Hockeytown may sell t-shirts, but Detroit is far and away Lionstown. I'm just one tiny example of that.
If the Wings or Pistons won one playoff game, or even one playoff series, in the last forty years, they would not sell 50,000 tickets to a regular season game. The Tigers have had trouble getting 10,000 a game in recent years amidst a decade long decline. The Lions? They win one post-season contest in four decades and still could sell out the old 70,000 seat Pontiac Silverdome with some regularity.
Unlike the Pistons, Wings and Tigers who have all won World Championships in the last twenty years, the Lions last title came in 1957. Yet, they are the team most Detroiters love the most. Yeah, pro football is king nationwide (Los Angeles notwithstanding), but there is some special about Detroit's relationship to it's NFL franchise.
I'm beginning to think the Lions have become Detroit's version of the Chicago Cubs. Lovable losers. Often mediocre, at best. A team that rarely makes the playoffs and usually exits quickly once they arrive. Fans go because their fathers and grandfathers have. It's tradition as much as anything.
The team's failure will certainly spring criticism, even unimaginable frustration, but it won't turn the fans away. They return with new found hope come that first kickoff. I'm as guilty as anyone else. I adore baseball. Everyone who knows me acknowledges this. However, the Lions are probably my favorite local team. I don't know why, either. Maybe those ten years of sharing season tickets won me over.
It wasn't the drunken fights at the Silverdome. It wasn't walking over that stinking bridge between parking lots over M-59 in December. It wasn't the consistent ticket price increases. It sure wasn't the team's success, either. Just like the other mindless followers of this franchise, I love draft day (the Lions version of the Super Bowl) and hope they improve each season.
This year's opener comes Sunday in Chicago. The town is abuzz about the potential of newcomers Kevin Jones and Roy Williams. Added to previous first round choices Joey Harrington and Charles Rogers and the Lions faithful believe their might even be an offensive attack in Honolulu Blue and Silver this year.
Hockeytown may sell t-shirts, but Detroit is far and away Lionstown. I'm just one tiny example of that.
Motor City Soccer?
Much to my surprise, an organization called MLS Detroit is trying to lure an expansion franchise to the Metro area. I read about it over at ESPN's Soccernet and then checked out their website. They are looking for $10 deposits from potential season ticket holders. They hope to get some response from MLS by the end of September. Good luck, MLS Detroit.
Monday, September 06, 2004
B.B. Baker's Dozen
Combining my love of baked goods and college football, here is the Beyond Boxscores Baker's Dozen (that's thirteen for you low carb zealots) after the first week of gridiron action. Enjoy this over the doughnut of your choice.
1. Southern Cal-A solid, if unspectacular, win away from home.
2. Oklahoma-If they run like this all year they will be #1 in January.
3. LSU-A scare at home.
4. Georgia-Another less than impressive start for a top 5 team.
5. Florida State-Can Rix lead the Seminoles to a win Friday?
6. Miami-Can Berlin lead the 'Canes to a win Friday?
7. Michigan-Could be a QB controversy forthcoming.
8. Texas-Benson looked Heisman-like.
9. Ohio State-If Zwick plays this well all season OSU will move up.
10. Utah-Smith would get my Week One Heisman vote.
11. Florida-I like Chris Leak.
12. West Virginia-Good team, terrible conference.
13. Iowa-Probably a Big Ten bias vote on my part. Hey, I'm honest.
1. Southern Cal-A solid, if unspectacular, win away from home.
2. Oklahoma-If they run like this all year they will be #1 in January.
3. LSU-A scare at home.
4. Georgia-Another less than impressive start for a top 5 team.
5. Florida State-Can Rix lead the Seminoles to a win Friday?
6. Miami-Can Berlin lead the 'Canes to a win Friday?
7. Michigan-Could be a QB controversy forthcoming.
8. Texas-Benson looked Heisman-like.
9. Ohio State-If Zwick plays this well all season OSU will move up.
10. Utah-Smith would get my Week One Heisman vote.
11. Florida-I like Chris Leak.
12. West Virginia-Good team, terrible conference.
13. Iowa-Probably a Big Ten bias vote on my part. Hey, I'm honest.
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
Vols Turn To Freshmen QBs
ESPN.com reports that Tennessee will start one of their two freshmen quarterbacks this Sunday. It will be the first time in SEC history a true freshman will start the first game of the year. That's kind of amazing considering the history of the SEC. However, I know how much football people frown on first-year starters.
I have always found it interesting how coaches, fans and the media cry aloud how a freshman just can't play QB. This is especially true at the "big programs". You can't expect a true freshman to play at places like Ohio State, USC or Tennessee. The way people go on about it, you'd think we are talking about aerospace technology, not football.
I guess what I find so interesting/funny/ridiculous, is that all of these freshman QBs that cannot possibly be good enough to play immediately were all unstoppable phenoms destined for greatness when they were recruited just six months ago. Now, they are incapable of ousting a mediocre junior who has taken all of sixteen snaps in two years.
Whomever Phil Fulmer picks, I hope the Vols new, young QB has a fine year. It will help make all this talk of quarterback play as rocket science die down a bit.
I have always found it interesting how coaches, fans and the media cry aloud how a freshman just can't play QB. This is especially true at the "big programs". You can't expect a true freshman to play at places like Ohio State, USC or Tennessee. The way people go on about it, you'd think we are talking about aerospace technology, not football.
I guess what I find so interesting/funny/ridiculous, is that all of these freshman QBs that cannot possibly be good enough to play immediately were all unstoppable phenoms destined for greatness when they were recruited just six months ago. Now, they are incapable of ousting a mediocre junior who has taken all of sixteen snaps in two years.
Whomever Phil Fulmer picks, I hope the Vols new, young QB has a fine year. It will help make all this talk of quarterback play as rocket science die down a bit.
Overlooked In Oklahoma
I have never seen a Heisman Trophy winner take as much criticism as Jason White. Nor have I ever seen a defending Heisman winner so overlooked the next year. How many players coming off a Heisman Trophy aren't even considered first team All-America the following campaign? None, I would suspect. Yet, that's the position the Oklahoma quarterback finds himself in.
There is no denying White played horribly in the Sooners last two games, but his lackluster performances versus Kansas State and LSU have stirred an almost irrational response from the media. They almost seem vindictive. Somehow I get the impression they feel liked they got duped into voting for White, so now they are mad.
What these guys don't understand is why they voted for White in the first place. He was the best college football player in the country in the regular season. He threw for 40 touchdowns and 4,708 yards while playing for the number one team in the nation most of the season.
White is also a great comeback story. The kind of story people used to embrace. He battled back from consecutive lost seasons due to knee injuries. He walked right into the starting QB job on the team picked number one in the pre-season at a university steeped in football tradition. All White did was have the best statistical season any OU quarterback ever had.
Jason White was not Heisman-like in his last two games. Nor was he healthy. However, that doesn't seem to matter to some. They seem so bent out of shape over his two game post-season decline that they can barely put him on their Heisman radar in '04. I'm hoping White forces them to vote for him one more time.
There is no denying White played horribly in the Sooners last two games, but his lackluster performances versus Kansas State and LSU have stirred an almost irrational response from the media. They almost seem vindictive. Somehow I get the impression they feel liked they got duped into voting for White, so now they are mad.
What these guys don't understand is why they voted for White in the first place. He was the best college football player in the country in the regular season. He threw for 40 touchdowns and 4,708 yards while playing for the number one team in the nation most of the season.
White is also a great comeback story. The kind of story people used to embrace. He battled back from consecutive lost seasons due to knee injuries. He walked right into the starting QB job on the team picked number one in the pre-season at a university steeped in football tradition. All White did was have the best statistical season any OU quarterback ever had.
Jason White was not Heisman-like in his last two games. Nor was he healthy. However, that doesn't seem to matter to some. They seem so bent out of shape over his two game post-season decline that they can barely put him on their Heisman radar in '04. I'm hoping White forces them to vote for him one more time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)